Chile?,oh,that insignificant country at our border,yes,where they said that we had the back covered.
COWARDS.
of course im against to them,they are traitors.
and yes,we had to conquer first chile instead of trying to conquer the malvinas!
How can they be traitors to you? They’re a different country.
How can they be traitors to you? They’re a different country.[/quote]
they are traitors because they said that they were covering our back only because they were scared,and then they help the invader against our motherland!
And???
They betrayed us ensuring that Argentina had the back well-covered, the same time when they sent support to the British forces…
Is not necessary to be from the same country to be or not a traitor.
stoatman,read this posts,and delete your post,you are looking like a dullard
i don’ think its coward, country work for their best interest.
For sure!
In the logic proposed by Erwin, a Polish could blame British and French people for being “cowards and traitors” in 1939 (even if The Empire and France declared war on Germany on 3rd of September, they don’t declare on Soviet Union; moreover, it was a bizarre “war” up to May 1940 on Western front).
…and the Polish fought before and after their surrender as a country without any rude comment on British and French side.
What have Chile really done wrong? We never attacked Argentina from Chilean territory, the only military involvement of Chile I’ve ever heard of was an rumour that the SAS had used Chile as a refuge after an attack on somewhere in Argentina - but is that any different to Allied POWs in WW" running to Switzerland? Surely you will always head to the nearest neutral territory if you find yourself alone in the middle of enemy territory.
Thanks, needed a good laugh.
Thanks, needed a good laugh.[/quote]
fuck off.
also we could conquer chile,and we can now if we want.
[quote=“BDL”]What have Chile really done wrong? We never attacked Argentina from Chilean territory, the only military involvement of Chile I’ve ever heard of was an rumour that the SAS had used Chile as a refuge after an attack on somewhere in Argentina - but is that any different to Allied POWs in WW" running to Switzerland? Surely you will always head to the nearest neutral territory if you find yourself alone in the middle of enemy territory.[/quote
A base in puerto montt,were british aircrafts came in chilean aircrafts with chilean flags,also if you said this is not true,the chilean officer already proved that on tv!.
they were cowards,in a remote potential danger they helped the enemy of their neighboor.
For sure!
In the logic proposed by Erwin, a Polish could blame British and French people for being “cowards and traitors” in 1939 (even if The Empire and France declared war on Germany on 3rd of September, they don’t declare on Soviet Union; moreover, it was a bizarre “war” up to May 1940 on Western front).
…and the Polish fought before and after their surrender as a country without any rude comment on British and French side.[/quote]
???,that wasn’t a potential and remote danger.
wrong topic also mate 
Edited by Dani. Typo error - potenital=potential. Cheers Erwin!
you don’t think it since im disagree with you in all things.
whatever that suppose to mean, erwin
What aircraft Erwin? The only rumours I’ve ever heard involving Chile was that an SAS patrol headed there after an attempted attack on an Argentinian airfield, I don’t know if that’s true or not, it’s a rumour. Since Argentina was never attacked by British aircraft, does it matter if British aircraft did land in Chile?
Thanks, needed a good laugh.[/quote]
fuck off.
also we could conquer chile,and we can now if we want.[/quote]
Mr. Erwin Schätzer(argentina), I want to remind you that this is a offensive post. Chill yourself mate and stop posting “fuck off”! Comprende?
For sure!
In the logic proposed by Erwin, a Polish could blame British and French people for being “cowards and traitors” in 1939 (even if The Empire and France declared war on Germany on 3rd of September, they don’t declare on Soviet Union; moreover, it was a bizarre “war” up to May 1940 on Western front).
…and the Polish fought before and after their surrender as a country without any rude comment on British and French side.[/quote]
???,that wasn’t a potential and remote danger.
wrong topic also mate
Edited by Dani. Typo error - potenital=potential. Cheers Erwin![/quote]
Sorry for my wrong post amigo!!! I was thinking that we were on a WW2 related forum!! :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:
OFF TOPIC:
And Erwin, it seems that you don’t give a shit on WW2 issues. You are interested IMO in 3 things:
- MALVINAS BELONGS TO ARGENTINA. FUCK ALL WHO DOESN’T BELIEVE IT!!!
- German immigrants (and especiallly SS men) in Argentina were the boost for Argentina after WW2. HEIL! HEIL!
- CHAT.
Speaking of chat, there is a plenty of differences between a forum and a chat. Try to figure them!
EDITED: IF YOU FEEL HARMED BY MY POST, FEEL FREE TO ASK MY DIMISSAL TO ww2admin, Gen. Sandworm and FW-190 Pilot. GRACIAS!
Look at the angry Prieten!.
1.Fuck you,i believe you are a part of ukraine!,oh,wait,claim them your territories and then talk.
2.Fuck off gipsy!!!,im one of those and im proud and i want everybody to know my colony.THANK YOU.
3.Ok,im sorry,why don’t you go for a cry with your british brothers?.
Damn fucking romanian,you’re poor as shit,are you european?,im afraid they are not going to accept your country in the european union because they don’t want fucking gipsies!.
Speaking here is no need to suck the balls of your arrse mates,Comprendes?.
EDITED: IF YOU FEEL HARMED BY MY POST, FEEL FREE TO ASK MY DIMISSAL TO ww2admin, Gen. Sandworm and FW-190 Pilot. GRACIAS! (BUT FIRST,YOU HAVE TO DO THE SAME WITH DANI’s POST,IF NOT,YOU WILL BE UNFAIR.GRAZIE!
WE CALL IT REALISM!