BDL said: “The Falklands have never been a part of Argentina”
Wrong again my partner… The first argentine colonization to the Malvinas was in 1820. By that time, the United Kingdom had finalized the official claims to the Spanish Empire (The last claim was in 1770, and never, I repeat, NEVER the UK reclaimed the islands).
A british is saying that the Malvinas islands have never been part of Argentina? Don’t you remember that in 1825 the United Kingdom recognized as a free state to Argentina, and ALL the ARGENTINE-DOMINE territories, included the Malvinas islands, which were colonized by the Argentine government 4 years before?.
Remember that the argentine people were living since 1821, an argentine village was funded in 1827, an official governor was sent in 1829, and the village with the argentine inhabitants were there when the HMS Clio arrived and turned out to all them, in 1833.
They are closer to us,they are part of the patagonia,and they were les malouines before!
FUNDAMENTOS DE SOBERANÍA ARGENTINA
Herencia de España.
Proximidad al país propiamente dicho.
Geográficamente se hallan cerca de la costa patagónica. Gozan de un mismo clima y tienen una economía similar a la de nuestros territorios del sur.
Se hallan dentro de la plataforma continental, que por el derecho internacional después de la Convención de Ginebra de 1958, pertenecen al estado costero, de pleno derecho.
Derecho de dominio emergente por la situación pontificia.
Descubrimiento y ocupación del territorio.
Usucapión.
Derecho de primer ocupante.
translate it,im not going to do that.
and also,they were firstly sight by a magellan’s tripulant,not by any brit.
THERE ARE MORE QUOTES THAN THIS.
FOR 1000.0000.0000.0000 TIME,THEY ARE BRITISH BECAUSE YOU SENT THEM TO OCCUPPY THAT DOMINATION/STOLEN TERRITORY,OF COURSE THEY WANT TO STAY BRITISH,BECAUSE IF THE ARGENTINES GO THERE,THEY WILL KILL THEM!,AND THE 200 YEARS,I DON’T GIVE A SHIT FOR THEM,YES,AND WE HAVE MORE REASONS THAN 200 YEARS OF STOLING A NATIONAL TERRITORY WITH YOUR IMPERIALIST IDEAS.
THANKS
There is no such nationality as Kelper, Kelpers are people who collect sea weed (Kelp) that has been washed onto the sea shore and dry it for use as either fuel or fertiliser. The employment died out in the UK in the mid 1800s when artificial fertilisers first came into use.
I do hope you’re not using an insulting name for a nationality you don’t like though Erwin, we all remember how much you cried about the alleged (although we only ever saw it used by you) use of the word Dago, don’t we? You wouldn’t want to be labelled a hypocrite, would you?
As we can feed all our people, and they all have somewhere to live, there are clearly not too many people living on our island. There’s always plenty of space on the Falklands should we ever need to move a few people out though, I suppose.
Interesting that you cite France and the US as exclusively helping us, where do Exocets, A-4 Skyhawks and Mirages come from?
As for the Chileans insulting you on the radio, how very dare they? Imagine insulting someone on the radio while you’re engaged in a real shooting war with a true world power.
Which European countries were at Britain’s side during the war? Name one single unit that fought in the Falklands that wasn’t either British or Argentinian.[/quote]
THEY COME FROM FRANCE,AND BEFORE THE WAR,WE BOUGHT THEM AS I SAID,BUT THEN THEY HELPED YOU TO COUNTER ATTACK US,IDIOT!.
THE CHILEANS DONE IT,AND THEY INTERRUPTED OUR COMMUNICATIONS WITH INTERFERENCES,IM SURE OF THAT,ASK AN ARGENTINE VETERAN IF YOU FIND ONE,IF HE DID HEAR THEM!.
THEY SUPPORTED YOU,BUT NO WITH MILITARY UNITS!
IM TALKING ABOUT THAT THEY DECLARED TO BE AT YOUR SIDE!,LIKE ARGENTINA STAYED NEUTRAL DURING WW2 AND THEN WE WERE AT ALLIES SIDE.
voted against me?,i considered you shit before the votes.
grow up?,the 21’s boy is going debate with an oldie,and still giving good reasons as in the malvinas thread NOW.also eagle does,and he is not older than me.
go away?,you don’t have the power to order me that
i will be like i am,im not a fake.
Well, now you’ve put it in capitals and a bigger font I’m convinced. Why didn’t you do that 25 years ago and we wouldn’t have had all these arguments.
By your reasoning of them being closer to Argentina than Britain, Argentina must belong to Chile or Brazil, you are right next door after all.
You spend a lot of time arguing about something you don’t give a shit about Erwin. Did you get whatever the Spanish says from the same website as you get your statistics for British losses in the 1982 war?
Oh and - for the 1,000,000th time, the Falklands are British because Argentinians can’t fight and got beaten an smaller army that was 8,000 miles from home with worse equipment and absolutely no means of getting support other than the forces already deployed, despite being dug into terrain that could have been designed to be defended forever.
There is no such nationality as Kelper, Kelpers are people who collect sea weed (Kelp) that has been washed onto the sea shore and dry it for use as either fuel or fertiliser. The employment died out in the UK in the mid 1800s when artificial fertilisers first came into use.
I do hope you’re not using an insulting name for a nationality you don’t like though Erwin, we all remember how much you cried about the alleged (although we only ever saw it used by you) use of the word Dago, don’t we? You wouldn’t want to be labelled a hypocrite, would you?
As we can feed all our people, and they all have somewhere to live, there are clearly not too many people living on our island. There’s always plenty of space on the Falklands should we ever need to move a few people out though, I suppose.[/quote]
Nobody helped us counter attack Erwin, we bought weapons in exactly the same way as Argentina did, we just bought better ones. The French certainly did not help us.
I don’t care what the Chileans did or did not do, it was war and in war you get allies to help you. They didn’t like you, they liked us, they helped us win the war (maybe), who cares? Live with it.
I’m sure the Royal Marine, Paras and Gurkhas tabbing across the Islands were well happy that the French had declared themselves to be neutral but on our side. It must have made the cold, wet, poor equipment and low rations seem like nothing to know that the French were neutral.
Well, now you’ve put it in capitals and a bigger font I’m convinced. Why didn’t you do that 25 years ago and we wouldn’t have had all these arguments.
By your reasoning of them being closer to Argentina than Britain, Argentina must belong to Chile or Brazil, you are right next door after all.
You spend a lot of time arguing about something you don’t give a shit about Erwin. Did you get whatever the Spanish says from the same website as you get your statistics for British losses in the 1982 war?
Oh and - for the 1,000,000th time, the Falklands are British because Argentinians can’t fight and got beaten an smaller army that was 8,000 miles from home with worse equipment and absolutely no means of getting support other than the forces already deployed, despite being dug into terrain that could have been designed to be defended forever.[/quote]
an smaller army with support of most of the countries,satellites,better navy,better army equipment,fighting versus inexpert (still with more balls) conscripts of 18 years.
advantages,the equipment?,oh,im sure our old fals and the broken and out of service nightvisors (which didn’t work in the war) and the help of chile by giving our postions,and of course,the help of being an empire (in that time you were) with a bigger army and more usual conflicts = more experience (but not balls).
Erwin. Did you get whatever the Spanish says from the same website as you get your statistics for British losses in the 1982 war?
germany says other things,look at its investigations.
I’ve never once heard anyone British call anyone from the Falklands a Kelper. I’ve heard them called Bennies, Stills and Weird Inbreds, but never Kelper. Since the source is an Argentinian site discussing the Falklands, I’m inclined to believe it’s as believable as French marriage vows.
The Falkland Islaners have the right to live there.
You Argies and we Brits need to realise that it is not our Islands.
I vote we let them be independant under the UN.
After all other countries have declared their independance from their master in the past. An example of this is the brave Argentinians who broke away from Spain.
Let us salute a brave Malvinian, who says finally, lets break away from Britian and be an independant country within th UN.
Who can argue against that? Especially when history is involved.
yes,the poor nepaleses,paratroopers and marines,all well trained with their big moustaches and their brighty uniforms,vs our young 18 years conscripts who were in their homes with their girlfriends or mums the other day!.
neutral?,ask a frog about the malvinas.
cold?,our soldiers were mostly from the north of argentina,were they have a lot of hotness because of the temperature,your guys were in london and well trained.
poor equipment?,LOL LOL LOL,ours had broken nightvisors,fals that weren’t working well,and wet jackets and inside the trenches with the cold water at the legs level.
poor rations?,ours eated shit instead of food,our army has the worst food in the world,i remember that in the chernobyl nuke,our soldiers finished eating the chickens of chernobyl with radiation
I’ve never once heard anyone British call anyone from the Falklands a Kelper. I’ve heard them called Bennies, Stills and Weird Inbreds, but never Kelper. Since the source is an Argentinian site discussing the Falklands, I’m inclined to believe it’s as believable as French marriage vows.[/quote]
yes,they did and i heard,kelper is in english,not in spanish btw.
i don’t believe any british site,it’s more believable an argentinian site,without the bbc propaganda.
No country supported us, we fought all alone, apart from Chile letting the SAS extract to there and allegedly doing some kind of comms jamming. We certainly never had better Army equipment, the Argentine conscripts were often better equipped than the British soldiers they were fighting. I’ll leave you to talk about soldier’s balls.
advantages,the equipment?,oh,im sure our old fals and the broken and out of service nightvisors (which didn’t work in the war) and the help of chile by giving our postions,and of course,the help of being an empire (in that time you were) with a bigger army and more usual conflicts = more experience (but not balls).
Were our FALS far better than your FALS? Since your version could fire automatic and ours couldn’t, I’d say you might have had the better version. The British nightvision equipment was far inferior to the Argentinian kit. We hadn’t had an Empire for 30 years by 1982.
germany says other things,look at its investigations.
fck! ANOTHER TIME,THEY ARE BRITISH,THEY WILL FCK ON ARGENTINA BECAUSE THEY ARE FOREINGNERS,WHY DON’T WE KICK THEM,PUT THERE A FEW ARGIES,AND THEN!!!,GIVE THEM INDEPENDENCE!!! EH!!
THOSE BRAVE ARGENTINIANS KICK YOUR ASSES IN THE TWO BRITISH INVASIONS 1806-1807.
Edit by PzKpfw VI Tiger: Just doing a wee bit of censoring on the language.
What do you think 5 Airborne Brigade were doing before you invaded and forced them to be dragged away from their families and girlfriends to win a war? Are wars often decided by which side has the biggest moustache? Bright uniforms are often seen as a disadvantage in moder war, which is why the British Army stopped using bright red coats in about 1860. How old do you think most of the British soldiers in the war were?
neutral?,ask a frog about the malvinas.
I doubt they’d give a shit about it, since they were neutral and not involved in the war.
cold?,our soldiers were mostly from the north of argentina,were they have a lot of hotness because of the temperature,your guys were in london and well trained.
London is similar in climate to the Falklands winter is it Erwin?
poor equipment?,LOL LOL LOL,ours had broken nightvisors,fals that weren’t working well,and wet jackets and inside the trenches with the cold water at the legs level.
The Argentinians were better equipped than the British. Our nightvision equipment was a generation older than yours, we used the same rifles. Didn’t the British have wet jackets and trenches full of water?
poor rations?,ours eated shit instead of food,our army has the worst food in the world,i remember that in the chernobyl nuke,our soldiers finished eating the chickens of chernobyl with radiation
Chernobyl happened five years after the Falklands War
What do you think 5 Airborne Brigade were doing before you invaded and forced them to be dragged away from their families and girlfriends to win a war? Are wars often decided by which side has the biggest moustache? Bright uniforms are often seen as a disadvantage in moder war, which is why the British Army stopped using bright red coats in about 1860. How old do you think most of the British soldiers in the war were?
neutral?,ask a frog about the malvinas.
I doubt they’d give a shit about it, since they were neutral and not involved in the war.
cold?,our soldiers were mostly from the north of argentina,were they have a lot of hotness because of the temperature,your guys were in london and well trained.
London is similar in climate to the Falklands winter is it Erwin?
poor equipment?,LOL LOL LOL,ours had broken nightvisors,fals that weren’t working well,and wet jackets and inside the trenches with the cold water at the legs level.
The Argentinians were better equipped than the British. Our nightvision equipment was a generation older than yours, we used the same rifles. Didn’t the British have wet jackets and trenches full of water?
poor rations?,ours eated shit instead of food,our army has the worst food in the world,i remember that in the chernobyl nuke,our soldiers finished eating the chickens of chernobyl with radiation
Chernobyl happened five years after the Falklands War[/quote]
1.THEY CHOOSED TO BE IN THE ARMY,IF THEY DON’T LIKE THE WAR,THEY ARE IDIOTS,england is beligerant (has a lot of wars),and the moustache was bigger at your side,we don’t use to wear moustaches.
however,in that war we also had some moustachy guys!.
2.FROGS ARE AT YOUR SIDE!,THEY CALL THEM FALKLANDS
3.london?,oh,then they didn’t feel too much climate difference,you are attacking yourself.
4.the equipment was older but better mantained!,ours were failing because we didn’t take care of them!.
5.I KNOW WHEN CHERNOBYL HAPPENED,YES,IM SHOWING YOU THAT OUR ARMY EATS SHIT IN EVERY TIME.
