Well you can have Gordon Broon back as Primus Inter Pares for starters 
The people who fought there were argentines,the people living there in those years were CRIOLLOS,and also they already had the idea of having an independent motherland and after the independence they remained as argentines so that’s Argentina 2 - England 1.
The people who defended the motherland with exit where the criollos,no the spanish forces.
THAT MEANS WE STILL HAVE WON. 
actually, in china history, there is a war between general Hong and general lao. both power are to compete to conquer the whole china and set up a dynasty. In the early stage of the war, General Hong was keep winning against general Lao beceause of the superior number of soldiers and (somtimes better strategic), but at the end, General Lao has won only a few battle and he already trap General Hong and force him to suicide.
So my point is, as long as the objective is done, who cares you lost a million times.[/quote]
i don’t mind about the general Long and any dinasty that has a nothing with the malvinas,we have enough reasons to claim them.
would you like to left one day your house,and at the other day find it occupied?,the people there will not be you,there will be another people there,so,that house does belong to them now?.
i also thought your post was stupid,who cares about a flag?,they stole a national territory,which doesn’t have to belong to them and they will pay.
With that phrase you must be friend of the frogs ,does that is an important fact?.
for 1.000.000,ok,let’s do that,but firstly,change those islanders for argentines and then give them the independence
I also see the british flag in australia,and new zeland and i see the texas flag in chile.I see your simpathy for the argentines as you are an admin and have to don’t take sides.
hong kong was part of britain too,eh?.
and where are them?,have you read our sovereignity rights in our claims?,do you know where are those islands or you searched them on google?.
please,i prefer a longer comment.
you don’t know much about the malvinas do you?,im asking not attacking.[/quote]
thats the most stupid post i ever saw
commonwealth country would have british flag, just to respect britain, but of course they do not belong to Britain
and for that island you are talking about, there is british troops, british flags. What is left to debate, please tell me :roll:
and yes hk was belong to england, and it has return to china
however falkland island belongs to England right now, they might belong to agentina in the future, but not now, that is so obvious that george bush should able to understand[/quote]
no,it isn’t,it is yours about the flag,does that is an important fact?,i don’t care about a flag,i have an idea,let’s kick the brits from the islands,full it of argies and then remain the malvinas british flag,ok? .
british troops are occupation forces,i would like to see your home occupied by hostiles,then you would have to rethink about what you’ve said 
.
I also see the british flag in australia,and new zeland and i see the texas flag in chile.I see your simpathy for the argentines as you are an admin and have to don’t take sides.
hong kong was part of britain too,eh?.
and where are them?,have you read our sovereignity rights in our claims?,do you know where are those islands or you searched them on google?.
please,i prefer a longer comment.
you don’t know much about the malvinas do you?,im asking not attacking.[/quote]
thats the most stupid post i ever saw
commonwealth country would have british flag, just to respect britain, but of course they do not belong to Britain
and for that island you are talking about, there is british troops, british flags. What is left to debate, please tell me :roll:
and yes hk was belong to england, and it has return to china
however falkland island belongs to England right now, they might belong to agentina in the future, but not now, that is so obvious that george bush should able to understand[/quote]
no,it isn’t,it is yours about the flag,does that is an important fact?,i don’t care about a flag,i have an idea,let’s kick the brits from the islands,full it of argies and then remain the malvinas british flag,ok? .
british troops are occupation forces,i would like to see your home occupied by hostiles,then you would have to rethink about what you’ve said .[/quote]
that doesn’t make sense at all
someone translate that to english for me?
FW-109 Pilot, I doubt Erwins post would make any sense in Spanish let alone English my best guess would be “same shit different day”
well, i do understand one part about him wishing the agentinian military would try to take the island back from the British. But if they could do it, they would do that in year 1982, or maybe the time frame between 1990-2005, but so far they have done nothing since the war in 1982!
if angentia force invade the island sucuessfully, then it belongs to agentina. but so far they havent done that, so it still belongs to britain
like the example of the war between england and france. France lost the war in canada and was force to give up the land to england. its simuliar case, can the french government claim that the eastern canada actually belongs to them because they once owned the land? thats no for sure
So Erwin, any ideas?
I’ve had enough of the whinging from the Argentinians on this one now. It’s boring.
Either:
Might Makes Right, so if you want stuff you have to fight for it
OR
The original inhabitants should get the territory. In which case the Argentinians had better hand their country back to whichever of the Amerind tribes was there before the Spanish turned up. And the guys in the US should be giving it back to us, just before we give it back to the Mohicans et al.
This thread has gone on long enough now. It’s all very well saying " ah, but if the rest of the World hadn’t been on your side, and we’d used proper troops instead of conscripts, and we didn’t think you’d want the Falklands enough to fight for them", but that isn’t what happened.
You lost. Get over it.
(My bold) but the point is Erwin, that the Falklands are not your or any Argentinians home, are they?
In fact just how many Argentinians would want to live there for any reason other than staking some sort of territorial claim? If the Falklands were unoccupied and unclaimed by any other nation I doubt they would be of any interest to Argentina, you are like spoiled children that only want something because somebody else has it.
You still have not given any reason as to why Argentina claims South Georgia and the South Sandwich Isles, I think we deserve an answer to this one.
I agree totally with the Fluffy one. This has gone on for long enough in an ever decreasing circle.
Let the people who live there decide what they want to be. They have been there for generations and its their Island, not the Brits or the Argentines.
Either accept it and stop whining on about it incessantly like a petulant child, or declare war and attempt another comquest.
So Erwin, any ideas?[/quote]
because they are also part of our territory that have been stolen,the malvinas islands,islands georgias and sandwich of the south.
But people consider the most important claim is the malvinas and not the georgias and sandwich that are not important as the malvinas.
the malvinas are argentine!
The aboriginals are history,and an insignificant percentage in our population,we have an entire country to claim the islands,and you always change the topic as a reason to distract,WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU WANT?,ARGENTINA BACK FOR THE ABORIGINS?,IS IT YOUR PROBLEM?,DOES THAT IS AN IMPORTANT TOPIC FOR YOU?,IS THAT THE REASON OF YOUR LIFE?.
COME ON!.
yes,we did not have luck,you had too much help from a lot of european countries,and for your info,most of latin american countries and rusia were at our side!.
We will invade again. Get over it.
[quote=“Bladensburg”]
(My bold) but the point is Erwin, that the Falklands are not your or any Argentinians home, are they?
In fact just how many Argentinians would want to live there for any reason other than staking some sort of territorial claim? If the Falklands were unoccupied and unclaimed by any other nation I doubt they would be of any interest to Argentina, you are like spoiled children that only want something because somebody else has it.
You still have not given any reason as to why Argentina claims South Georgia and the South Sandwich Isles, I think we deserve an answer to this one.[/quote]
it is a part of our home,its like having the garage occupied by walts that have not any important reason to have them except their imperialist ideas of controlling the south atlantic,with their actitudes of crushed ex-empire which is not the center of the world now,and that gives you pain in the backside.How many argentinians want to live there?,more than a 1/4 of the population ,we are an entire country and we have reasons to claim them,i posted it in a lot of posts.
about the georgias and sandwich you are out off topic,that is not the point.
this topic is about the malvinas.
You are feeding the circle by posting here for your information
yes,let the people,the descendents of those who lived there that were argentines.no,the people in the islands:the kelpers,the pirates (royal troops in there),the occupiers,the stolers.
petulant child?,you are a single insignificant person,i am too,but im based in the claims of an entire nation and the most important nation of all latin america and as Eagle said,a really important country.
I have,Argentina has,enough reasons to claim them.
OK,if you are going to cry always that you don’t like the topic or you are tired of it,and after that posting again! (not very intelligent btw).
GO AND HAVE A DISCUSSION HERE:
www.malvinasvirtual.com.ar
Two points.
Firstly, although the title is ‘Malvinas Discussion’, the Falklands War is a very important part of that discussion. The South Sandwich Islands and South Georgia were seized as part of that war. As you so repeatedly insist, the object of the war was apparently to liberate prized possessions that are rightfully Argentina’s[sic]. If this is indeed true, then why did Argentina, as part of that war, seize far off islands on which it has never, to my knowledge, made any territorial claim?
Secondly, you say you base your claims on the ‘Most Important Nation of all South America’. Apart from this being a bold boast along the lines of being the ‘World’s Tallest Midget’, I don’t remember Brazil making any claims on the Falklands.
And as you’ve posted again while I was typing, I now have a third point: Why don’t you stick to discussing the Falklands War there too. You could even post here on the subject of World War Two.
firstly we have claims on them,and some are the same that in the malvinas,but i do not have knowledge about them.
secondly,yes,brazil don’t claims them because they don’t have reasons (but they have more than you!) and the most important nation in latin america is by far argentina,that has been demonstrated by eagle,our factories,our human level,our education,our culture,our IC,we have the biggest number of important scientists and discovers in all LA too,we have more importance in everything,eagle said,we are one of the countries with the biggest amount of resources if not the most (your tin pot island called britain will never have that)
your ironic expression has ignored the recent facts that eagle put in his posts,brazil hasn’t done the half of what we have done,we are a prepared country with professional people.We have enough know-how for being world power,but those deals that we made with usa fucked us.
we are officially the most important country in LA,that is well known.
and you say me that i have to stick in the topic?,you are a mod,you have to give the example.
well crappy,see you in malvinasvirtual.com.ar
because you are not there to cry,so,it isn’t funny as here,but go here if you have enough balls mrs Wank_to_Give.
www.malvinasvirtual.com.ar
discuss about the malvinas.
talking about ww2,yes,i did a post about it: http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=28460#28460
and during all my history in this forum,i did much more than you!