Happy Birthday Neslon Mandela!

I believe that! There was the Bureau Of State Securtiy (BOSS), followed by the Natonal Itelligence Service (NIS).

Nelson Mandela has been made a god. He is only a man. Since he took over everything went down the drain. Education, health, all public services, police and prisons. Criminals have more rights than the person that live according to the law.

As with other former colonies, people that are unprepared for power have attained it and lack the levels of competence of their former masters.

So to say it has always been a sh!t hole here incorrect. To blame it on Apartheid is bullsh!t.

No it hasn’t always been a shithole, if one is white. Though I would be so bold as to say that the townships were always shitholes.

A survey of 186 homes in Soweto, carried out in 1975 by the Department of Pediatrics of the University of Witswatersrand, found that 45% of the children aged 10 - 12 have malnutrition and 87% of the homes used candles for light with only 5% of the homes having electricity or gas.

A survey by the South African Institute of Race Relations found widespread racial disparities in economic and social indicators: the average monthly household income in 1991 for Africans was 779 rand, for whites it was over four times as high, 4,679 rand; the 1990 infant death rate per 1,000 live births for African infants was 52.8, for white infants it was 7.3; there were 216.7 new cases of tuberculosis per 100,000 Africans in 1987, but only 14.8 among whites; and the per capita school expenditure for African pupils was 1,248 rand, for white pupils it was 4,448 rand. (South African Institute of Race Relations, Race Relations Survey, 1993. See Anthony Leomn (ed.) The Geography of Change in South Africa (NY: Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1995) It was estimated that one of every four babies born in the homelands died during the first year of life. (South Africa Restrictions, Hearing before the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions Supervision, Regulation and Insurance of the House Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs, 98th Con, 1st Ses, Jun. 8, 1983 at 66 (Statement of Hon. William H. Gray)

Yes, the people are no longer confined to townships where no one gave a toss about the levels of crime there providing they didn’t spill out into the wider community. Now that the restrictions on movement have been removed and the ruthless among them, who have only known violence and banditry, are now making an impact outside the old boundaries. This
was always what the white folks most feared - “as ye sow, so shall ye reap!”

I’m sure Mandela, like all gangsters ran his empire from his cell, killing civilians …
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_Street_bombing

The ANC conducted torture in their camps http://groups.msn.com/Crimebustersofsouthafrica/ancthesecrettorturecampsoftheancregime.msnw
http://southafrica-pig.blogspot.com/2008/07/anc-torture-camps-and-necklacing.html
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE5D71730F936A25757C0A966958260

At the start of the 20th century, Soweto was a collection of shanty towns on the outskirts of Johannesburg where the British colonial authorities housed the black and colored laborers working the city’s gold mines. The apartheid regime formalized this divide, allowing blacks and coloreds into the city by day but confining them to dormitory towns at night. Soweto became the focus of oppression. In 1976, police there opened fire on 10,000 students protesting a policy to enforce education in Afrikaans; 566 people died.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1723692,00.html

Goes much further back than that…Don’t forget these migrationary workers came from other countries, they where migrant workers from the tribal regions in other countries and kingdoms…This is documneted fact, and some settled there…so reallyy, just like the whites, they are descended from foreigners and immigrants…Then take into consideration the Mfecane where for 40 years an area had been destroyed…Ethnically cleansed by the Matabele,a nd in effect, when the Voorttrekkers arrived the place was EMPTY the remains of burnt out villages acutely evident…There ye go…so how could the white man give back a land to anyone this anyone being a black tribe who had been cleansed by another black tribe?

Somehow, there is no big shout about the Indian Caste system…

What made the Police shoot?

Now they did not protest in a calm way. The ANC used the kids because they knew that if the police shot them then the whole world would go wild, or they did not expect the police would fire on the kids. The protest were not calm as everyone thought. They killed and burned things. When the Police arrived there they told them to please go home, but the crowd got more violent and at the end the police had to fire on them to keep order.

Yes people were killed, but if you at what made the police fire on the kids then you would have done the same thing. Protest here is 3/4 of the time not calm.

As I have said I will give you proof of what is going on here in SA.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4gv7isyXMI&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRuxy_4T4CI&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRuxy_4T4CI&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X38CW6l-em4&feature=related

Check out this link and the vids on the web page.

VERY GRAPHIC BE WARNED!

http://www.dienuwesuidafrika.blogspot.com/

Well just to add one little small thing. The townships were not a sh!thole when it was created, it is the WAY these people live! They through garbage on the streets and do not give a sh!t about it. YES there is trucks that come and pick up the garbage if it is in bags or in a trash can, but they stole those or use it for other sh!t. My mom worked in one of the squatter camps here and I was there a few times. They do not want to move there because they can do what ever they like and do not pay for water or power or taxes. If the government give them houses they sell it or rent it out.

For someone outside of a country to say he knows what is going on in that country is bullsh!t! To listen to someone that see it everyday and live there is way more reliable.

http://www.mapsofworld.com/world-top-ten/countries-with-highest-murder-rates.html
Read this aticle: http://www.int.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=15&art_id=vn20040926065732452C553558
Remember my ex wife overhearing two Zim nurses talking about her getting “raped recetly”…she heard: “it’s just forced sex”…That’s their attitude…Did you guys know that in south Africa raping a virgin cures one of aids?..They think this and there has been an upsurge in child rape cases…Many of the rape cases will not be reported (never mind withdrawn) in SA as it’s a way of life for the blacks…
This has always been the case throuhout history, and you wonder why Apartheid came about?..Apartheid means separateness…I wonder why…NOT!!
Go on, pull out the racist card…

Having drove past one of these “informal settlements” in Capetown, I noticed the run down shacks and dirty streets…With BMWs and Mercs parked poutside them…Interesting eh?
Guy came round begging to our door (widespread practise) but guess wot, as he was begging, his mobile phone rang!..

Someone here said “wake up”…???

Used to walk around in Capetown with a stanley knife in my pocket, ye know, a carpet knife?
I and my pregnant wife where attacked in our own home…Took the guys crow bar off him and chased him…They sure can run!
That’s how f…kin dodgy the place was…Still is for all I know, haven’t been there in 8years!

I agree with you jumpwings!

What does that have too do with anything?

So easy to judge people in poverty when you refuse to educate them and there is a polarization of wealth so profound, it’s ludicrous…

The townships lacked basic services, as those were reserved for the whites…

I think his point is that there are social stratifications in the Indian caste system which are equivalent to apartheid in SA, but people in the West who were opposed to apartheid and are opposed to other forms of racism or oppression choose to ignore it.

Mate of mine recalls being offended back in the sixties when his father was hosting a very wealthy Indian business contact here in mate’s family home. Mate challenged Indian’s assertion that there was no poverty in India and was assured that there was none. He realised much later that, in the Indian’s eyes, there wasn’t any poverty because the people the West sees as poor weren’t people, or didn’t matter, in the Indian’s eyes.

Same problem in Japan with their caste of untouchables. Most people in the West don’t even know they exist, let alone object to the discrimination they suffer in a rigid and vicious caste system.

No, not actually, the blacks also got things, but the break it or steal what is left. The blacks paid less taxes, paid less at the hospital, at the doctor and for education. Most of them did not pay taxes so why should they get things that the whites work for and do not just get?

If you just sit on your @ss the whole day do you think that you should get anything from anyone if you do not work for it? The blacks here complain about not having work but they are to lazy to work. My parents did not get anything from the government when they were younger, no free food, no free power, no free water, no less paying taxes, no lesser fees at the hospitals and doctors, they could just go where they wanted and vote.

You guys do not have a clue what is going on here. You take a lot of info from the internet and use it as facts, but if you did not see things yourself how can you say it is true?

Yes, the blacks did not have rights during apartheid, but the had food, they had work and there was law and order.

People from other African countries said that the blacks here in SA are lazy, racists and do not give a sh!t. That coming from other black people.

I am not trying or am not in any way being a racist, I am just telling you the facts. Oh by the way the Apartheid idea was not started by the white South Africans, it was the British Empire that started it and the whites South Africans took it further. If you look at the Boer Republics there were not such thing as racism. The black workers fought with the Boers against the British. Yes there were blacks that fought with the British, but they were promised a lot of things that did not see the light of day.

You in west also have a rigid sort of social discriminations.For instance the different close elite societies like a Massons or organisation ike a “Skull and bones” -where from all the american presidents come.
Your rich elite is pretty like to creat and play a “special mission societies” , where the access denied for usial peoples.
And many people in the west don’t even guess about what is going on up there.

I’m not so sure about this.

It’s also easy to see things in unrealistically simple terms when we’re outsiders.

I’m not defending the many abuses under the white SA regimes, but equally people I know who have lived there, including Australians with no allegiance to the Afrikaaners or others accused of oppressing the blacks, have been appalled by the conduct of some blacks towards whites and other blacks. This is going back mostly to the 1980s and 1990s.

It wasn’t the case that all whites were wealthy, or that all blacks, or coloureds, were poor or even not well off, any more than subscribing to popular misconceptions that all Jews are rich.

My understanding is that the townships under the white SA regimes were in part populated by people drawn to the cities in the hope of work or for less commendable reasons, and also by people from neighbouring countries who were displaced by white on black, black on white, and black on black violence in their home countries. They weren’t people the white South Africans rounded up and corralled there or wanted there, but people who just arrived there. In some respects the townships were more akin to refugee camps in Asia post-Vietnam or the Middle East post-1948 where the host countries also didn’t distinguish themselves by treating the inhabitants any better than the SAs did with the townships.

I think one of the biggest faults in these sorts of discussions is to see one lot as the goodies and the other lot as the baddies, with natural sympathies inclining us to see the underdog as the goodies. Life is rarely that simple.

If we transfer our focus to America, we can see that imprisonment rates of blacks are many times higher than whites. (Same in Australia, but our blacks are indigenous and equivalent to native Americans rather than American blacks.) Those who see blacks as the oppressed goodies interpret the crime and imprisonment rates as evidence of the oppressive nature of the dominant whites. Those who see the blacks as baddies interpret it as evidence of the inherent criminality of the blacks.

Those of us like me, who don’t see things in such clear terms, see that there are factors which may explain the higher incidence of criminal behaviour in a given group, but it doesn’t excuse it and it doesn’t absolve the offender of responsibility for his or her actions. But that is something to be considered in each case according to the offenders circumstances. The fact remains that most people in a given group don’t commit crimes.

Typing everyone in that group on the basis of the conduct of some of them is as irrational as excusing the offenders because most of their group doesn’t commit crimes.

Rather then lumping people into stereotypes based on skin colour or ethnicity, whether it be accusing all SA whites of being neo-Nazis or saying that all SA blacks are poor downtrodden victims of white oppression, it would be a lot fairer to judge each person on his or her actions. Otherwise we end up with the US military belief in WWII that blacks lacked courage and couldn’t fly aeroplanes and so on, which courageous blacks proved to be wrong, on the few occasions they were allowed to perform the same roles as whites.

I wouldn’t agree with that from where I live, but it demonstrates my point that people outside a society can see things in way that people inside don’t. It works at every level, from different national or ethnic groups in the same city to different nations.

Between nations, a lot of it comes from the sources of information and the motives for that information being provided.

The press isn’t interested in the lives of ordinary people. It wants spectacular events. These are often provided by people pushing a particular view. A street demonstration is the easiest to arrange. If it turns nasty with police attacking the demonstrators, or being presented as attacking them, plenty of press coverage and public comment is assured. That is just what the agitators want, and the press usually accommodates them.

Other dramatic events also get plenty of press coverage.

So, given the press coverage here over the past fifteen years or so, I could be forgiven for thinking that Russia is run by mafia and oligarchs who routinely kill journalists who threaten to expose them and that the Russian people is composed mostly of drunken veterans of the Afghanistan war and the few conscripts who have survived a brutal military system, with food being scarce and vodka plentiful, while Vladivostok is a vision of mafia hell exporting all kinds of menace to the rest of the world on the backs of orphans who start smoking at age six, and overall Russians are still afraid to offend the successors to the KGB. And so on. That’s just putting together various articles I have read over that period.

And here you are, an intelligent Russian with an iternet connection engaging in informed debate with people all over the planet, as well as being the proud owner of Lada limousine! :smiley:

Like so many things, we don’t base our beliefs or actions on what is really happening but upon our, frequently wrong, perceptions which are formed by people like the idiots in the press putting forward the lines of special interest groups.

But we don’t have to feel bad about it. That’s exactly how George the Idiot and the idiot formerly running my country and other idiots got us into Iraq. :frowning:

The Mfcane began when Zwide muredered the Abantu king (and mentor of the Zulu chief Shaka) Dingiswayo. It was a migration of people escaping Zwide’s brutal regime. Shaka defeated Zwide - in the first instance with a magnificent piece of generalship at the Battle of Gqokli Hill.

Shaka expanded his kingdom which caused further migrations. Included among the migrants, was the clan chief, and favourite of Shaka, Mzilikazi who founded Matabele Land in what is now Zimbabwe.

The later destruction of the Zulus at the hands of British (Lord Chelmsford), and the Matabele by Cecil Rhodes’s men resulted in the destruction of the socio-economic systems of these kingdoms. That destroyed, the populace were enticed to travel south to provide cheap labour in the gold and diamond mines of what was the Cape Colony and later became a part of the Republic of South Africa, as they have done ever since.

I doubt whether, should these systems have survived, there would have been much the White Rhodesians could have taught these people about keeping cattle, even in this day and age.

Neither Shaka nor Mzilikazi were noble savages, as they weren’t savage.

In the end, Shaka ‘left his hut’, but Mzilikazi remained a nobel king by any standards of any people at that stage of social development.

Gqokli Hill

1st ZULU-NDWANDWE WAR (1818)

During the 1st Zulu-Ndwandwe War, Dingiswayo was defeated and murdered by Zwide, chief of the Ndwandwe. An incompetent half-brother followed Dingiswayo on the Mthetwa throne and the clan’s power declined. There were three potential contenders for the rich prize of paramountcy:

the Qwabes, a large clan between the Mthetwa and the Zulus, showed signs of entering the contest;
the Ndwandwe; and
Shaka and his Zulus, who were hemmed in between the Qwabes and the Ndwandwe: tribes that were over twice the size of the Zulus.
Tension rose and a showdown between the Ndwandwe and the Zulu took place at Gqokli Hill [MAP] in April 1818.
Choice of terrain and deployment

Zwide sent a large force against Shaka, who at once snapped up the buffer clan and moved to meet the threat. Shaka abandoned his usual tactics, because the Dwandwe was far too large to think of encirclement. He took a strong circular defensive position around the summit of Gqokli Hill, thus avoiding dangerous exposed corners. The hill was topped by a deep depression within which he hid his reserve, with the result that only 1600 of his total fighting strength of 3600 was visible to the enemy. They were drawn up in five lines, with the four rear lines packed closely behind the leading one, and it gave the impression that the hill was thinly held.

Shaka sent the Zulu cattle off with an escort of 700 men, deliberately leaving the herd visible to draw off a portion of the enemy in pusuit. Nomahlanjana, commander-in-chief of the Ndwandwe forces, detached four regiments in pursuit of the Zulu cattle. The remaining eight regiments (each 1000 men strong) formed up in a semi-circle on the north-eastern base of Gqokli Hill.

Phase I

The battle opened shortly after 09:00 when the Ndwandwe made the first of a series of frontal attacks. As the attackers advanced to within 92 metres from the Zulus, their circular front narrowed until the lines buckled and a great confusion arose.

They finally drew up in badly dove-tailed formations before resuming the advance. Again the shrinking of the circle caused an evergrowing congestion in their lines. By the time they halted 23 metres from the Zulus, they were jammed together so tightly that they could not use their throwing assegais.

Shaka, who was commanding the edge of the plateau, had a clear view of the front and he launched his two front lines at the enemy. The Ndwandwe were no match for the Zulu skill at close quarters and in less than ten minutes well over 1000 Ndwandwe were killed. Nomohlanjana ordered the withdrawal of his regiments. Shaka ordered his two front lines to form up behind the others, so that the third line now became the front line. All Ndwandwe assegais were collected, the badly wounded Zulus helped up the hill, and those past any hope of recovery were mercifully despatched.

Phase II

After a pause the Ndwandwe advanced again, but this time with only half of their army and they were appropriately spaced. They halted within 23 metres from the Zulus and hurled their assegais at them. When they had nearly divested themselves of their weapons, Shaka’s two front lines rushed forward. The engagement lasted somewhat longer than the preceding one before Nomohlanjana ordered the withdrawal of his fighting lines to the foot of the hill. At least three Ndwandwe had died for every Zulu.

Phase III

The fresh rear half of the Ndwandwe army were now to advance to within 46 metres of the Zulu front line, and then they were to rush in. Whilst the front line was engaged, the second line were to throw their assegais through the gaps in the first, at any exposed portion of the Zulu warriors fighting in the front rank. Their plans were upset by Shaka, for as they approached to within 23 metres he sent his two leading lines crashing into them. The impact hurled the first enemy rank into the second, and they were jammed so close together that the third rank were unable to throw their assegais between the contemplated intervals. The Zulus pressed forward with the weight which their downward progress gave them, and vaulted at the Ndwande with their shields. In the meantime Shaka sent in his third line, leaving himself with one line in reserve. The strategic reserve on the plateau, was as yet untouched. The Zulus eventually drove the Ndwandwe back.

Phase IV

Two more frontal attacks were equally unsuccesful and, by mid-afternoon, the Ndwandwe were exhausted. In addition to heavy casualties, they had suffered the loss of scores of men who had wandered off in search of water. [Shaka, well supplied on the summit, had carefully chosen a location some kilometres from the nearest spring.]

Phase V

The Ndwandwe now staked everything on a last endeavour. They left about 1000 men in a semi-circle at the southern foot of the hill and formed the rest of the men into a column, with a front of 183 metres. They launched the column at the Zulu ring from the northern side, hoping to drive the defenders over the top and into the arms of the men waiting beyond.

When the head of the column was almost at the top of the hill, Shaka sent two parallel columns (each 750 men strong, eight warriors abreast) down on either side to envelope and annihilate it. He kept 500 reserves on the hill to serve as a “chest”. Having destroyed the column, Shaka circled the hill and attacked the remainder of the Nwandwe, whose view of events had been blocked by the summit. This group broke, and managed to rejoin the regiments returning from the cattle chase.

The surviving Nwandwe were now together, totallling about 3500. Shaka was outnumbered and was forced to retreat to KwaBulawayo. There he was reinforced by the last scrapings of his reseve and small parties streaming in from their pursuit of the Ndwandwe defeat on the hill. Shaka had approxiamtely 1000 men to his immediate disposal. He diverted some of them to the rear of the force attacking him. Shortly afterwards the Belebele brigade, having completed the mopping up of the water-seeking parties of Ndwandwe, arrived on the enemy’s right flank. Less than 1000 Ndwandwe escaped encirclement and eath. The Ndwandwe finally withdrew, taking all the Zulu cattle with them.

Although Shaka lost upwards of 1500 killed and 500 seriously wounded, he was well pleased with the results of the first real test of the Zulu army. He had beaten off and killed about 7500 warriors of a tribe more than twice the size of his own.

2nd ZULU-NDWANDWE WAR (1819)

The Ndwandwe was still a force to reckon with. When the Ndwandwe army eventually returned, they found the Zulu valley completely deserted - all crops had been destroyed and all sign of life - human and livestock - had vanished. They came upon a few Zulu decoys who led them to kwaNomveve, where the Zulu army overpowered them during the night. In the next year (1819) Shaka defeated the Ndwandwe convincingly.

Shaka’s formation when engaging the column in phase V, was the classic Zulu ‘Buffalo’ formation.

In this way how can you know about caste of untouchables in Japane?
May be this is just invention of hungry for sensation journalists?
And how you know the troubles in Africa?If mass media just express the particular limited view on events.

So, given the press coverage here over the past fifteen years or so, I could be forgiven for thinking that Russia is run by mafia and oligarchs who routinely kill journalists who threaten to expose them and that the Russian people is composed mostly of drunken veterans of the Afghanistan war and the few conscripts who have survived a brutal military system, with food being scarce and vodka plentiful, while Vladivostok is a vision of mafia hell exporting all kinds of menace to the rest of the world on the backs of orphans who start smoking at age six, and overall Russians are still afraid to offend the successors to the KGB. And so on. That’s just putting together various articles I have read over that period.

You will laugh, but this is true;)
Of course not literaly , but many of that was actually happened especialy in mid 1990-yy.
The particular view doesn’t always mean false view right?

And here you are, an intelligent Russian with an iternet connection engaging in informed debate with people all over the planet, as well as being the proud owner of Lada limousine! :smiley:

Like so many things, we don’t base our beliefs or actions on what is really happening but upon our, frequently wrong, perceptions which are formed by people like the idiots in the press putting forward the lines of special interest groups.

But we don’t have to feel bad about it. That’s exactly how George the Idiot and the idiot formerly running my country and other idiots got us into Iraq. :frowning:

But was it just ONLY George “idiot” who has got you into Iraq?
If the mass media portray him as “idiot” - does it mean we shall think that he is only was wanted a war?
May be some groups of peoples, that we don’t see, determine his actions?And mass media who wants spectacular events just make George the scapegoat?

They’re real.

Burakumin

Definition of Burakumin

The Burakumin (another term is eta)are the outcast society of Japan, shunned even to this day. The term means literally “hamlet people”, referring to the fact that they traditionally lived on the edges of towns, rather than in the towns themselves.

This group of people is similar to the untouchable class in India. These are people who are looked upon with contempt. For example, if a person plans to marry someone and finds out that one of their ancestors was a Burakumin, then the marriage will be canceled. The term eta is written with two ideograms which mean “much impurity” or “much dirt.” Another term used to describe this group is hisabetsu buraku, or “discriminated communities.”

One term of contempt for these people is kokonotsu, (nine), not ten, which makes them imperfect, something less than human. Non-burakumin Japanese see the burakumin as inherently morally defective.

The eta are concentrated in a few areas of Japan, namely in parts of Kyushu, the coasts of the Inland Sea, Kobe, Osaka and Kyoto.

There are around 2,000,000 outcasts in 5,000 settlements. Dimensions of Japanese Society: Gender, Margins and Mainstream, 1999.

Origins of discrimination against burakumin.

Discrimination against these people came about because of Buddhist prohibitions against killing and Shinto concepts of pollution, along with governmental efforts at controlling the population. The people were originally discriminated against because they were butchers, leather workers, grave-diggers, tanners, executioners and, at least in some cases, entertainers.

From the book Japan: A Modern History, 2002:

“Fundamental Shinto beliefs equated goodness and godliness with purity and cleanliness, and they further held that impurities could cling to things and persons, making them evil or sinful… But a person could become seriously contaminated by habitually killing animals or committing some hideous misdeed that ripped at the fabric of the community, such as engaging in incest or bestiality. Such persons, custom decreed, had to be cast out from the rest of society, condemned to wander from place to place, surviving as best they could by begging or by earning a few coins as itinerant singers, dancers, mimes, and acrobats.”

The “impurity” of these people was considered to be spreadable to other people (much as a disease is spread). The people were classified as eta (“pollution in abundance”), binin (“nonhuman”), or Eta (“leather workers”).

In addition, the “condition” was considered to be hereditary. The eta were not even allowed to leave the communities of their birth.

The binin included beggars, street performers, people were were “economically marginal” and people who had committed crimes and had forfeited their commoner status as a result.

The Ainu, the original inhabitants of Japan, sometimes fall under the burakumin umbrella along with prisoners of war, clandestine immigrants, Koreans, Filipinos and others like them.

The Ainu are ethnically, physically and culturally different than the Japanese majority. They are the native inhabitants of Japan; the people who are referred to as “Japanese” are actually the “Yamato Japanese”. Some people accept the Ainu as being “primitive Japanese”. Their genetic stock includes southeast Asian, Siberian and northeast Asian peoples. There are around 25,000 Ainu left, but not many of them are pure-blooded.

(They are also not Caucasians as some people have been led to believe. They are descended from the Jomon people who arrived before the Yayoi immigrants who became the Yamato Japanese, the Jomon forebearers coming to Japan about 15,000 years ago, the Yayoi immigrants entering around 300 BCE.)

The Meiji regime required the Ainu to worship at Shinto shrines, take Japanese names, have their children learn the Japanese language at school and to adopt Japanese clothing and hairstyles.

In the 1930 the Ainu Society was formed to lobby for the Ainu.

The burakumin is estimated to number about 2% of the Japanese population or roughly 2 million people (actual figures run from 1 million to 3 million).

During the Tokugawa era various restrictions developed in relation to the burakumin. “They had to wear certain types of clothing and display identification marks. Marriage with ordinary people’ was prohibited. They were also banned from using the same shrines or temples as ordinary people and had to have their own.” Dimensions of Japanese Society: Gender, Margins and Mainstream, 1999 They could not live outside their designated areas, could not eat, sit or smoke in the company of commoners, could not serve as servants of commoners, could not wear wooden shoes and could not enter a commoner’s home. Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan, 1987

Laws and Associations

In 1871 a law was passed (The Emancipation Edict of 1871) which was supposed to emancipate this group of people but it was a law without any teeth and could not make any progress against centuries of prejudice.

In actuality, it helped identify burakumin even easier as they were officially classified as “new commoners” in family registries kept at the towns, etc, people were born in. Thus, someone could consult the official records and easily see who was and who was not burakumin.

A movement called the Leveller’s Association of Japan in 1922 tried to bring the problem of how the eta were treated to the attention of the nation. The problem was that the militarists, who were gaining more and more power in the nation, were suspicious of this action and thought that the people involved were linked to Communism, so nothing got done at that time.

After the end of World War II the National Committee for Burakumin Liberation was founded but changed its name to the Burakumin Liberation League in 1955… The league was joined by socialist and communist parties and pressured the Japanese government into making concessions in the late 1960’s which included a Special Measures Law for Assimilation Projects which provided financial aid to burakumin communities. Family registers from the 19th century were closed except for special legal cases, supposedly making it harder to investigate a person’s background when being considered as a possible marriage prospect.

As the U.S. has found out with its attempt to end racial prejudice, just eliminating restrictive laws and regulations does not bring social acceptability or social justice to a group of oppressed people. Some Burakumin have tried to move out of their ghettos or isolated areas and “blend” into society in general, but education, employment and marriage inquiries into a person’s background always present the threat that their Burakumin status will be revealed.

Such a situation, of course, tends to be self-fulfilling as the burakumin are unable to get good education and good jobs and thus are effectively kept in their lower-class status. About 5% of the burakumin are on welfare, which is seven times the national average.