Israel warns of "extreme action" to free a soldier captured by Palestinian militants

Jordan Calls for Arab Peacemaking With Israel
NewsMax.com
NewsMax.com Wires
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/8/16/100927.shtml?s=lh

Wednesday, Aug. 16, 2006

AMMAN, Jordan – Jordan called Tuesday for the immediate resumption of Arab peacemaking with Israel, saying the time was ripe after guns fell silent in the Lebanese-Israeli conflict.

King Abdullah II warned that the Lebanon conflict “could be repeated unless the international community shoulders its responsibility and works for a comprehensive solution to he Arab-Israeli conflict.”

The “stalemate…jeopardizes the opportunities for peace and stability in the region,” Abdullah said in talks with German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, who is on a tour of Jordan and Saudi Arabia.

Government spokesman Nasser Judeh said Jordan was working with Arab governments to revive the peace process with Israel.

“We have to have negotiations and solve outstanding issues, particularly the Palestinian question,” Judeh said, adding the “root-cause” of Mideast crises was the lingering Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

On Monday, Abdullah urged Arab leaders to devise a comprehensive strategy to deal with crises besetting the Mideast.

He told a gathering of Jordanian lawmakers in Amman that “the challenges in Palestine, Iraq and Lebanon demand setting a comprehensive Arab strategy to deal with them.”

Last week, Abdullah cautioned his Israeli and U.S. allies that the fighting in Lebanon weakened moderates, like himself, and caused a backlash against them across the Mideast.

Israelis In Lebanon
Strategy Page
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htsf/articles/20060817.aspx

August 17, 2006:

Commandos prefer to operate in the shadows, but the recent Israeli operations in Lebanon put the spotlight on their commandos at work. News reports from Lebanon indicated that there were at least three, and possibly more, raids deep into the country. Some two dozen Hizbollah members were brought back as prisoners, and many more were left dead. The elite navy, army and air force commandos apparently carried out these operations.

But many more raids and recon operations were apparently undertaken closer to the Israeli border, by the many other Israeli commando type troops. Once more details of some of these operations got into the Arab and Israeli media, the military usually discloses a few more details, if only to avoid any misunderstandings.

Israel has a large force of special operations type troops, for a country its size (six million). There are two small battalions of Arabic speaking troops used for undercover operations and raids into the Palestinian territories. Sayeret Shimshon (Unit 367) is assigned to the Gaza Strip, while Sayeret Duvdevan (Unit 217) takes care of the West Bank. There are four companies of Ranger type troops (Palsar) that normally are assigned to one of the four elite infantry brigades of the army, and two more to support armored brigades. There are also three LRRP companies (Special Command Teams), with one assigned to each of the army’s corps headquarters. Lotar Eilat and Unit Yamam are two hostage rescue units (each under 100 troops.) These units are also used as commandos (as when there is a lot of violence with the Palestinians.) There are also several hundred highly trained LRRP troops assigned directly to intelligence units. The navy has a SEAL unit (Shayetet 13) of about 400 men. This unit is more selective than the other commando units, with about 80 percent of it’s candidates failing the training course, compared to about 50 percent with other units. The navy also has a company size unit of divers (similar to U.S. UDT). The police force also has over a thousand specially trained men who are a cut above your usual SWAT teams.

Cheers for the varied sources George, I find I come here first thing to review your snippets.

You’re welcome and thanks Firefly :slight_smile:

I’m glad that I picked up on your suggestion as it makes for a more well rounded view of the news.

I will try to get more posted tomorrow - today has been very busy for me.

Cheers.

George, the .50 rifle ( L.A.R Grizzly ??) owned by Michael in that movie made me drowl at that time (sorry by the off-topic)

[b]Hi Panzerknacker,

I have only seen Tremors2 once, but got a kick out of it. The first Tremors movie was pretty entertaining too.

I think it was a LAR Grizzly.[/b]

my old Tremors2 Signature that you are refering to:

Burt’s Guns
http://www.zombiehunters.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11757&sid=8618e7cd70c2015e8c82a6b81d5df7a1

SavageArcher:
"The first picture Bear posted I don’t reconize unless it was a promo. I don’t remember any desert camo’d pickup or a Barret M82 .50 cal. I only remember him using a Grizzly .50 in the 2nd and 3rd. "

http://homepage.mac.com/bloodfield/html/guest_html/guest_tad/grizzly2.jpg
http://homepage.mac.com/bloodfield/html/guest_html/guest_tad/grizzly1.jpg

see also:
http://www.geocities.com/burt_trem/burtsguns.html

Burt Gummer
“Doing what I can, with what I’ve got.”
http://www.fluency.paintedtarget.org/df/road/tremors.html

FUNNIEST movie gun moments
http://www.thehighroad.org/archive/index.php/t-81978.html

CrudeGT:
May 16th, 2004, 02:20 PM
"Anyone ever see Tremors2? god that was an awful movie. But it had a pretty funny scene.

Some of the characters from the first movie are in the second, namely Bert, the gun nut (and my hero :smiley: ) He’s got a new .50bmg sniper rifle he wants to show off. and he gets just the chance. He is in a group of about 5 people. They are running from building to building, to avoid the new tremors. The new ones are not big worms from under ground, they walk on 2 legs, above grounds, and use heat as well as vibration to find prey. They just need to run between 2 buildings and around a corner and they will have made it to the jeep, and to safety. But there is a little tremor thing in the alleyway. Bert lines up his shot with the .50bmg, takes aim and the little tremor EXPLODES (that was cool). They run over to the truck, and one of the other people notice a hole in the wall behind where the tremor was standing. She looks through the wall, and whats she see, the jeep. The bullet had gone through the tremor through like 3 concrete walls, and through the engine block of the jeep.

I want that gun…"

Video clip montage of the movie including scene described above - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVNq7Uhmbng

bullets penetrating through people
http://forums.beyondunreal.com/archive/index.php/t-71812.html

BlueSniper:
29th Jun 2001, 03:27 PM
“I was watching Tremors2 and Bert used a 50BMG rifle that split a monster in half while traveling through a brick wall, three barrels, and the front of a car. is this realistic?”

International Tremors Fans Portal
Bert’s Guns

http://tremorsfan.com/viewtopic.php?t=104&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0&sid=5a83574c12354df62b499127114c9e84
http://tremorsfan.com/viewtopic.php?p=10761&highlight=&sid=115c78f2d2851ac5d55401956bf1e643

ActionBurt
Graboid Hunter:

"Burt has so far used:

M82A1 .50 sniper rifle
HK G3 with collapsing stock (from Night of the Shriekers)
Desert Eagle (unknown caliber)

Burt also has
>bolt action rifle, with wood stock. Unknown model
>M-16 with collapsing stock (Tyler used it in NoS and we see it on the wall)
>(30?)40mm multishot grenade launcher (liek from Tremors 3 opening sequence) hanging on the wall
>M-870 (?) 12 gauge pump shotgun (Rosalita used it)
>Nickel-plated M1911(?) (Put it under his pillow in "A Little Paranoia)
and a few other handuns on his wall I can’t identify- they’re too small on the screen.

(I am working on a new wall of weapons. So far I think I’ve identified most of the silouhettes on his wall)"

Nice Pic of the Merkava Mk I. - Thanks :slight_smile:

Here are some interesting webpages on Israeli armor and weapons:

Israeli-Weapons.com
http://www.israeli-weapons.com/

Merkava tanks:
http://www.israeli-weapons.com/weapons/vehicles/tanks/merkava/Merkava.html
http://www.israeli-weapons.com/weapons/vehicles/tanks/merkava/MerkavaMk1.html
http://www.israeli-weapons.com/weapons/vehicles/tanks/merkava/MerkavaMk2.html
http://www.israeli-weapons.com/weapons/vehicles/tanks/merkava/MerkavaMk3.html
http://www.israeli-weapons.com/weapons/vehicles/tanks/merkava/MerkavaMk4.html

Namera Heavy-Weight IFV/APC (Merkava variant)
http://www.israeli-weapons.com/weapons/vehicles/armored_personnel_carriers/namera/Namera.htm
http://dx.ampednews.com/images/news/4623/123.jpg
http://dx.ampednews.com/images/news/4625/1234567.jpg
http://dx.ampednews.com/?page=articles&id=12022

It was a L.A.R then…I was in doubt because that muzzle brake is not quiet the same wich I had seen in a Grizzly before, thank for the links.

Israel Downplayed Hezbollah’s Arsenal
Fox News
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,208899,00.html

Thursday, August 17, 2006

JERUSALEM — Israel’s defense minister, his credentials already in question before the just-ended war in Lebanon, says the military downplayed the extent of the Hezbollah guerrilla group’s missile threat when he took office, according to a newspaper report Thursday.

As public criticism of the war’s handling mounted in Israel, the Haaretz daily quoted Defense Minister Amir Peretz as saying top military officers did not relay all relevant information about Hezbollah’s arsenal after he took office in May.

Hezbollah fired nearly 4,000 rockets at Israel during 34 days of fighting, including several medium-range missiles that for the first time hit Israel’s third-largest city, Haifa. A truce Monday halted the violence that killed 39 civilians and 118 soldiers.

Security officials said the military command decided earlier this year, for budgetary reasons, to halt development of advanced systems that would have protected tanks against missiles. After Hezbollah’s anti-tank missiles killed dozens of Israeli soldiers, the Defense Ministry and army have decided to develop and install the systems, the officials said.

They spoke on condition of anonymity because of the confidential nature of armaments development.

With the lull in fighting, the unity that held the Israeli public together during the war has shattered. Military commanders and armchair generals alike have begun questioning key decisions taken by Israel’s wartime leaders.

Among the complaints are the terms of the truce, a heavy reliance on airstrikes in the early phase of the war and a massive ground offensive ordered as the cease-fire deal seemed imminent.

Peretz, head of the dovish Labor Party, has drawn more fire than Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and military chief Lt. Gen. Dan Halutz. Peretz is the only one of the three whom a majority of the public wants out, according to a poll earlier this week by the Dahaf Research Institute.

While some observers had welcomed the appointment of a civilian to head the Defense Ministry, others questioned the wisdom of choosing a former union boss who spent much of his brief and unremarkable military service fixing tanks.

“The appointment of Amir Peretz as defense minister was a crazy idea,” political commentator Nahum Barnea wrote on the front page of the Yediot Ahronot newspaper Thursday, calling on him to resign.

Peretz, meanwhile, has appointed former military chief Amnon Lipkin-Shahak to review the handling of the war, but not his own conduct.

The Israeli army began handing over positions to the U.N. early Thursday, stepping up its withdrawal from southern Lebanon after the Lebanese government agreed to deploy troops near Israel’s border for the first time in 40 years.

More than 50 percent of the areas Israel holds have been transferred already, the army said in a statement.

At the peak of the fighting earlier this week, some 30,000 Israeli troops had been in Lebanon.

U.N. vehicles crossed into Lebanon from Israel on Thursday as Israeli soldiers loaded tanks onto carriers for transport south. Enormous fields in northern Israel that had been full of tanks and artillery vehicles a day earlier were almost empty on Thursday.

Israel Humvees patrolled the northern border, while dozens of troops patrolled the northern town of Kiryat Shemona looking for unexploded Hezbollah rockets.

The U.N.-brokered truce authorizes up to 15,000 U.N. peacekeepers to help 15,000 Lebanese troops extend their authority throughout southern Lebanon, which Hezbollah had controlled before Israel invaded.

The aim is to create a buffer zone free of Hezbollah fighters between the Litani River, 18 miles north of Israel, and the U.N.-drawn border with Israel.

Following talks with U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan in New York on Wednesday, Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni said Israel wanted the expanded U.N. force to help monitor the Lebanese border to prevent Iran and Syria from replenishing Hezbollah’s weapons.

And in Washington, Israeli Vice Premier Shimon Peres said Israel had destroyed almost all of the militia’s missiles, one-quarter of their short-range rockets and all the missile bases.

Iran Suspected of Attempts to Rearm Hezbollah Since Cease-Fire
Fox News
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,209071,00.html

Thursday, August 17, 2006

WASHINGTON — Iran has been attempting to rearm the Lebanon-based terror network Hezbollah since the U.N.-backed cease-fire between Hezbollah and Israel took hold earlier this week, two U.S. officials told FOX News on Thursday.

A U.S. arms control official said it appears that Iran is using Syrian channels in its effort to give Hezbollah weapons it has used in the past, including Chinese-built C-802 radar-guided anti-ship missiles. Military observers said a C-802 was used successfully on an Israeli naval vessel off the coast of Tyre on July 14. The arms control officer and a senior American counterterrorism officer both said the U.S. government is “very concerned” about the “ongoing” effort.

Israel’s Cabinet approved the U.N.-brokered cease-fire agreement Monday after 34 days of clashes across the Lebanon-Israeli border that began in response to Hezbollah kidnapping two Israeli soldiers in a cross-border raid and killing three others. Israel retaliated with air and ground strikes throughout Lebanon in an attempt to disarm the terror group, often taking criticism for causing civilian deaths. Hezbollah retaliated by firing 4,000 short- and mid-range rockets into northern Israel.

The cease-fire resolution authorizes up to 15,000 U.N. peacekeepers to deploy to southern Lebanon, a region the Shiite Muslim-rooted Hezbollah has controlled since Israel pulled back across the border in 2000. It also calls for the disarmament of Hezbollah and the unconditional return of the captured Israeli soldiers.

The counterterrorism official said the administration is “working with all of our allies” to get the message to Russia and China that they must do whatever they can to prevent their missiles from ending up in Lebanon.

A foreign government source told FOX News that the Chinese supplied Iran with at least 50 C-802s, and that the Iranians violated their contract with the Chinese by providing this weaponry to Hezbollah.

But the arms control officer was skeptical of that conclusion, saying, “Of course the Chinese knew” that Iran would turn over its weapons to Hezbollah, but Beijing doesn’t care at all about nonproliferation.

“It’s cash, and it’s a lot of cash,” the officer said, adding that while some members of the Bush administration have been willing to give the Chinese the benefit of the doubt and attribute the weapons proliferation to “bad export control,” the geopolitical leanings of the Chinese have created the proliferation problem. The officials noted that none of China’s weapons have inadvertently ended up in countries like India or Taiwan.

A leading security expert agreed with that conclusion.

“China understood that Iran was backing Hezbollah, they would have had to understood that in principal that if they transferred something to Iran, there’s always a possibility that Iran was going to retransfer that Hezbollah,” said John Pike, head of GlobalSecurity.org.

The arms control officer expressed optimism that an arms embargo in Lebanon could hold up in the short-term, but was less hopeful about the future.

“What happens in three months? If the will is there, the guns will get there,” the officer said.

Also of concern is the prospect that Turkey, a Muslim ally in the War on Terror, is serving as or had been a point of access in the past for arms destined for Hezbollah. Pike said in recent days, Israelis have addressed their concerns directly to the Turks over the trans-shipment.

“They requested that Turkey detain a couple of airplanes coming into Lebanon from Iran. Turned out not to have weapons on them, but I don’t think this is the last of it,” Pike said. “Turkey has simply been looking the other way.”

State Department spokesman Tom Casey said he was confident that if the situation in Turkey had been a problem, it isn’t now.

“My understanding is that the issue of potential arms shipments through Turkey and through other countries are things that we have talked about with the Turkish government. … We’re fully convinced that they are taking and doing what would be necessary to prevent arms transfers from going through,” Casey said.

FOX News’ James Rosen contributed to this report.

Israel Complains Hezbollah Used Russian-Made Missiles
Fox News
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,209162,00.html

Friday, August 18, 2006

Associated Press

JERUSALEM — Israel has complained to Russia that Russian-made anti-tank missiles have reached Hezbollah guerrillas who used them against Israeli troops in south Lebanon, government officials said Friday.

An Israeli delegation traveled to Moscow earlier this week to deliver the complaint, said Asaf Shariv, a senior adviser to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert.

The anti-tank missiles proved to be one of Hezbollah’s most effective weapons in combat with Israeli soldiers in Lebanon. Such missiles killed at least 50 of the 118 soldiers who died in the 34-day war that ended this week.

Another government official, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the matter with the media, said the delegation was “senior,” but refused to say who they would be meeting with in Russia.

Israel does not accuse Russia of directly arming Hezbollah, but complains that Russia sold the weapons to Iran and Syria, known supporters of Hezbollah, who then passed them on to the guerrilla group.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Mikhail Kamynin said Russia maintains strict controls over its weapons sales, and that tight supervision “makes any inaccuracy in weapons destinations impossible.”

Anatoly Tsyganok, head of Russia’s Military Forecasting Center, ruled out the possibility that modern anti-tank weapons had reached Hezbollah through Russia or Syria.

“Any accusations alleging Russian or Syrian deliveries of anti-tank weapons to any forces in Lebanon are unfounded. The Israeli side has not presented any evidence of this, and it is unlikely that it will,” Tsyganok was recently quoted as saying by the Interfax news agency.

“Most probably, such weapons, should Hezbollah militants really have any, might have been brought to Lebanon through third countries,” he added.

Returning Israeli Troops Angry Over Equipment, Tactics
Fox News
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,209401,00.html

Saturday, August 19, 2006

Associated Press

METULLA, Israel — Israeli soldiers returning from the war in Lebanon say the army was slow to rescue wounded comrades and suffered from a lack of supplies so dire that they had to drink water from the canteens of dead Hezbollah guerrillas.

“We fought for nothing. We cleared houses that will be reoccupied in no time,” said Ilia Marshak, a 22-year-old infantryman who spent a week in Lebanon.

Marshak said his unit was hindered by a lack of information, poor training and untested equipment. In one instance, Israeli troops occupying two houses inadvertently fired at each other because of poor communication between their commanders.

“We almost killed each other,” he said. “We shot like blind people. … We shot sheep and goats.”

In a nation mythologized for decisive military victories over Arab foes, the stalemate after a 34-day war in Lebanon has surprised many.

The war was widely seen in Israel as a just response to a July 12 cross-border attack in which Hezbollah gunmen killed three Israeli soldiers and captured two. But the wartime solidarity crumbled after Israel agreed to pull its army from south Lebanon without crushing Hezbollah or rescuing the captured soldiers.

A total of 118 Israeli soldiers were killed in the fighting, and the army was often caught off guard by a well-trained guerrilla force backed by Iran and Syria that used sophisticated weapons and tactics. Soldiers, for instance, complained that Hezbollah fighters sometimes disguised themselves in Israeli uniforms.

Military experts and commentators have criticized the army for relying too heavily on air power and delaying the start of ground action for too long. They say the army underestimated Hezbollah, and that Prime Minister Ehud Olmert set an unrealistic goal by pledging to destroy the guerrilla group.

This week, Israeli Defense Minister Amir Peretz appointed a former army chief to investigate the military’s handling of the war.

Some of the harshest criticism has come from reservists, who form the backbone of the army. Israeli men do three years of mandatory service beginning at age 18, but continue to do reserve duty several weeks a year into their 40s.

Israeli newspapers quoted disgruntled reservists as saying they had no provisions in Lebanon, were sent into battle with outdated or faulty equipment and insufficient supplies, and received little or no training.

“I personally haven’t thrown a grenade in 15 years, and I thought I’d get a chance to do so before going north,” an unidentified reservist in an elite infantry brigade was quoted as telling the Maariv daily.

Israel’s largest paper, Yediot Ahronot, quoted one soldier as saying thirsty troops threw chlorine tablets into filthy water in sheep and cow troughs. Another said his unit took canteens from dead guerrillas.

“When you’re thirsty and have to keep fighting, you don’t think a lot, and there is no time to feel disgusted,” the unidentified soldier was quoted as saying.

The newspaper said helicopters were hindered from delivering food supplies or carrying out rescue operations because commanders feared the aircraft would be shot down. In some cases, soldiers bled to death because they were not rescued in time, Yediot Ahronot said.

The Israeli military said it was aware of the complaints, had tried to address them in the course of the fighting and was still looking into them. It had no comment on specific complaints.

Comrades of the two soldiers captured by Hezbollah sent a petition to the prime minister Thursday accusing the government of abandoning the men.

“We went to reserve duty with the certainty that all of Israel’s citizens, and the Israeli government, believe in the same value that every combatant learns from his first day in basic training — you don’t leave friends behind,” the soldiers wrote. “This is a moral low point. The Israeli government has abandoned two IDF (Israeli Defense Force) combatants that it sent on a mission.”

The petition was being circulated Friday; it was unclear how many soldiers had signed it.

While such sentiments aren’t shared by all soldiers, even some senior commanders acknowledge the army came up short in Lebanon.

When soldier Gil Ovadia returned home, his commander made no mention of victory in an address to their battalion. Instead, the commander told them the war was over, said they did a good job, and advised that they be prepared to come back soon and fight again.

“We’ll be back in Lebanon in a few months, maybe years,” Ovadia said.

Former commander warns of UN ‘disaster’ in Lebanon
Times Online
By Philippe Naughton and agencies
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,251-2319047,00.html

August 18, 2006

Italy pledged a significant number of troops to the United Nations peacekeeping force in southern Lebanon today, stepping into the breach after France pledged a mere 400 troops instead of the thousands the UN had hoped for.

The composition of the urgently awaited force to police Monday’s ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah was today starting to emerge, after prolonged delays.

But the force’s mandate has been heavily criticised by a former commander of UN blue berets in Bosnia, who warned that the peacekeepers would be powerless to stop a massacre if shooting broke out again, as their rules of engagement were so weak as to be a “recipe for disaster”.

In the conflict zone, where a five-day ceasefire is still holding, the Lebanese army reached the country’s southern border with Israel for the first time in 40 years - although it was largely a symbolic move.

A sole jeep, flying a large Lebanese flag and carrying just two soldiers in green camouflage uniforms, passed by the Fatima Gate in the village of Kfar Kila, best known as the place where the last Israeli forces withdrew from southern Lebanon in 2000 after an 18-year-occupation. Villagers threw rice and held Hezbollah banners, but the jeep did not stop.

Lebanon sent a first detachment of 2,500 troops across the Litani river into southern Lebanon yesterday, the first time it has been officially in control of the area since 1968, when it ceded authority to Palestinian guerrillas who used the mountanous region as a base for cross-border raids into Israel.

A total of 15,000 Lebanese troops are eventually supposed to deploy in the region under a UN Security Council resolution to end more than a month of fighting between Hezbollah guerrillas and Israel, although their deployment has so far been to predominantly Christian towns.

They are to be joined by an equal number of foreign troops, but potential donors are wary of being drawn into a no-win situation in which Hezbollah, the Shia Muslim guerrilla group, could again provoke Israel into battle.

France, the former colonial power in Lebanon, had widely been expected to lead the beefed-up UN force, but said yesterday that it would contribute only 400 soldiers. Germany, uneasy given its Nazi past at any possible confrontation with Israeli forces - has decided not to send a maritime force but no ground troops.

The Italian Government formally agreed this morning to send peackeeping troops to Lebanon. “It’s an important choice for the country, which is aware of its implications and consequences,” said Romano Prodi, the Prime Minister, after a Cabinet meeting endorsed the move.

But Signor Prod did not give specifics, saying that the exact number of Italian troops to be sent to Lebanon and the details of the details of their deployment will be announced in the coming days when his Government has been given clear rules of engagement by the UN. Italy has said that it could sent as many as 3,000 soldiers to strengthen the existing force in southern Lebanon.

The UN still says that it hopes to have 3,500 troops on the ground within ten days and the entire 15,000-strong force by early November. But that timetable was questioned today by Lewis MacKenzie, a former Canadian general who headed the UN Protection Force in Bosnia during the early days of the siege of Sarajevo.

In an interview with BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, General MacKenzie said that he expected it to take a year before the UN force was operational - and it would be hamstrung by a mandate, under Chapter 6 of the UN Charter rather than the more robust Chapter 7, that would allow it to use lethal force only in self-defence.

“We all understand that what comes out of the Security Council is the lowest common denominator for the best-case scenario. What will happen is the worst-case scenario and the UN will be ill-prepared to cope with it,” he said.

“I understand that the UN commander will have to get approval from the Lebanese chain of command before he can use deadly force. I mean, it’s a recipe for disaster.”

General MacKenzie also warned that the lack of a proper mandate could see a repeat of the tragedies of Rwanda or Srebrenica, where UN commanders lacked the authority to prevent atrocities.

He said: "What will happen is that the UN commander, much like General Dallaire in Rwanda, will come back to the UN for permission to intervene and use force, and the UN will turn him down, and then the international community will condemn the commander for not doing what the international community thinks he should be doing.

“But if they read the fine print of the resolution it will be quite clear that he does not have does not have the authority to proceed.”

Italy rides to the rescue with offer of 3,000 troops
Times Online
From Richard Owen in Rome and Richard Beeston in Tyre
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2319413,00.html

August 19, 2006

ITALY, rather than France, yesterday emerged as the leading European contributor to the United Nations force in Lebanon after the Italian centre-left Cabinet approved the deployment of troops.
A statement issued after the Cabinet meeting did not give the size of the Italian contingent but UN officials confirmed reports in the Italian media that Rome was to deploy about 3,000 troops. The announcement came after the shock decision by France on Thursday not to commit the 5,000 troops that it had originally suggested to lead the force. France currently has 200 soldiers serving in the UN in southern Lebanon and has offered to send only another 200.

Arturo Parisi, the Italian Defence Minister, said that his country could even take command of the force, expected to number in total 15,000 troops. Other possible contributors are Spain, Turkey and Germany.

Romano Prodi, the Prime Minister, told reporters: “Italy wants to make its contribution to peace.” He pointed out that although its role is not widely acknowledged, Italy is one of Europe’s leading contributors to peacekeeping forces, from the Balkans to Afghanistan.

Italian troops are fondly remembered in Lebanon from 1982, when they were part of a multinational force sent to Beirut to provide security in the wake of Israel’s invasion. American and French forces, who led the mission, were attacked by suicide bombers, but the Italians were not targeted.

“The Italians share our Mediterranean soul,” said Hassan, a resident of Tyre, who pointed out that the Italians had been contributing a military helicopter contingent to the UN peacekeeping force in Lebanon for nearly 30 years. “They are very popular in Lebanon. They will be welcomed here.” While the Italians may have a reputation for being easygoing and friendly, those qualities could be a handicap as the strengthened UN peacekeeping force aims to impose its authority on southern Lebanon.

Those doubts were expressed by mourners in the village of Qana yesterday, where 26 civilians and four Hezbollah fighters were buried in a mass funeral. “The UN will not be able to protect us,” said Faten Shalhoub, a 23-year-old English teacher who lost several relatives and four students in the Israeli attack on the village on July 30. “They are not even able to protect themselves.”

Israel is also likely to be concerned that the strengthened UN force, which was supposed to have robust rules of engagement, will be ineffectual, particularly in disarming and disbanding Hezbollah forces south of the Litani river.

Signor Parisi and Signor Prodi insisted that the UN mission must have a “clear mandate with precise rules of engagement”.

Signor Prodi said that the operation would not be “an evening stroll” (una passeggiata), but Cabinet backing had been unanimous: “This is a new phase of Italian foreign policy, a phase of responsibility and credibility with a shared aim of helping the construction of peace in one of the most complex regions of the world.”

Signor Prodi added that Fouad Siniora, the Lebanese Prime Minister, had assured him that Hezbollah would co-operate with the UN force.

Italy is expected to move swiftly to deploy its troops, after approval by parliament.

Identifying All of the Hizbollah Rockets
Strategy Page
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htart/articles/20060818.aspx

August 18, 2006

With cease fire in place, more information has come out about the nature of Hizbollahs rocket arsenal. Most of the rockets Hizbollah had, perhaps 80 percent or more, were a World War II Russian design. This 122mm rocket had a range of 20 kilometers and a 13 pound warhead. There were also a number of longer range 122mm rockets, in this case 30 kilometers. Apparently, this model had the same 13 pound warhead, and achieved its increased range by being longer and heavier (standard 122mm rockets are nine feet long and weigh 150 pounds).

The rockets fired deeper into Israel included a 220mm Syrian model, with a range of 65 kilometers and a 90 pound warhead. Hizbollah modified the warhead to contain less explosives, and thousands of small steel balls. These peppered the area near where the warhead went off. There were also several larger 240mm rockets, with a range of ten kilometers and a 40 pound warhead.

These rockets were available from a number of manufacturers, including Syria. An Egyptian firm makes a number of longer range 122mm models and sells them on the world market. Israel probably has a good idea of who the manufacturers were, but has not released that data yet.

There were nearly a thousand, longer ranged, Iranian rockets under Hizbollah control. These include the 240mm Iranian Fadjr 3, with a range of 40 kilometers and a 110 pound warhead. The 333mm Iranian Fadjr 5 has a range of 100 kilometers and a 200 pound warhead. The 302mm Iranian Khaibar-1 has a range of 150 kilometers and a 220 pound warhead. The 610mm Iranian ZelZal-2 has a range of 200 kilometers and a 880 pound warhead. None of the ZelZal’s were used, and Israeli aircraft appeared to have destroyed one that was caught on the road. The ZelZal is moved, and launched, on a specially designed heavy truck. The Iranians apparently told Hizbollah not to use any of the longer range Iranian rockets, apparently for fear of retaliation from Israel

What Comes Next
Strategy Page
http://www.strategypage.com/qnd/israel/articles/20060818.aspx

August 18, 2006

While Hizbollah, in typical Arab fashion, proclaims their defeat as a victory, Israelis are arguing over the merits of the two strategies available to them for eliminating Hizbollah completely. The recent fighting crippled Hizbollah military power, destroyed billions of dollars of its assets, and actually improved Israeli combat power. Thousands of Israeli troops gained combat experience in southern Lebanon, and Israeli casualties had no effect on overall Israeli military strength.

The Israelis have two options available for destroying Hizbollah. The first option is to get someone else to deal with it. That means either the Lebanese and/or the UN. Keep in mind exactly what Hizbollah is. It is a radical Islamic organization dedicated to the destruction of Israel, and the eventual establishment of a world-wide Islamic dictatorship (in cooperation with its patron, Iran). Hizbollah has taken control of about a third of Lebanon, and runs it as a religious dictatorship, a branch office of the Iranian religious dictatorship. Hizbollah’s power base is the 1.3 million Lebanese who are Shia Moslem (like most Iranians are). The Shia comprise about 35 percent of the Lebanese population, and have long been the least prosperous third of the population. Hizbollah not only helped defend Shia interests during the 1975-90 civil war, but gave out tens of billions of dollars in Iranian money over the years. In return for all these favors, Hizbollah asks only for obedience, and volunteers for its trained terrorist force of several thousand fighters. Pro-Hizbollah Shia also dominate in the Lebanese army, a force put together since 1990 with the assistance of the Syrians. The Syrians are also allies of Iran, and consider most of Lebanon as part of Syria. France assembled Lebanon in the 1920s, after World War I, from bits of the recently disbanded Turkish empire. Historically, “Lebanon” was a string of coastal cities in what is now Lebanon. The French added some more territory inland, territory that had traditionally been considered part of Syria. The Syrians have not forgotten, neither have the Lebanese.

As part of the 1990 peace deal, brokered by Saudi Arabia, several divisions of Syrian troops were stationed in eastern Lebanon. These troops were necessary at first, but not for the last decade or so. The Syrians stayed to back up Hizbollah, make money by running the local economy, and because there was no one available to force them out. That changed last year, when years of anger at the Syrian occupation erupted into violent public demonstrations. The Syrians took the hint, and left. The 65 percent of the population that is not Shia (and is mostly Christian), are really unhappy about Syrian influence in Lebanon (the the murder of several Lebanese leaders over the last few years), and the continued existence of Hizbollah. But the Lebanese don’t want another round of civil war, just to disarm Hizbollah. Since the Syrian army was sent packing, negotiations were under way with Hizbollah to disarm them, and return “Hizbollahland” to Lebanese control.

Hizbollah was split on the disarmament issue. Many Lebanese Shia wanted to become part of Lebanon, not a state-within-a-state. But the more hardcore Hizbollah believed in the goal of destroying Israel and establishing the worldwide Islamic dictatorship. The hardcore guys pulled off the July 12th kidnapping of two Israeli soldiers. That kind of operation was a violation of the unofficial deal the Israelis and Hizbollah had worked out over the past five years. That raid indicated that Hizbollah was no longer in control of all its fighters.

The radicals were now able to do whatever they wanted, including firing off the 12,000 or so rockets Iran had sent to Hizbollah over the last six years. These rockets were not intended, by Iran, for an actual attack on Israel, because such an attack would not destroy Israel, and could trigger an Israeli counterattack on Iran. While the Iranians publicly show contempt for any Israeli air strike on Iranian nuclear weapons research sites, their military people, and many of the politicians, know better. Iran was not happy when the Hizbollah rockets started flying, and Iran apparently made sure that the larger Iranian made rockets (that could reach most of Israel) were not used. That point has been missed by most observers of the war.

The Hizbollah attack left Israel with two options. They could either launch a massive invasion, and overrun all of Lebanon and Syria, or do what they did (to encourage the Lebanese and UN to deal with Hizbollah.) The trouble with the second (“small war”) option is that it takes longer, and that leaves Hizbollah intact for longer. But the first (“big war”) option would leave thousands of Israeli soldiers dead, and involve the occupation, for months, if not years, of Lebanon and Syria. That strategy would involve handing Lebanon back to its elected government with the understanding that there would be no more Hizbollah. But there would still be the a Shia minority, and within that minority there would still be Shia radicals who took orders, or at least direction, from Shia radicals in Iran.

Syria has to be overrun because, if you don’t, Hizbollah can retreat to there from occupied Lebanon and set up shop in Syria. Take Syria and you eliminate any refuge (except Iran, where at least the senior Hizbollah people would flee to). While the Syrian military is no pushover, their armed forces have fallen apart since the end of the Cold War, and Soviet subsidies. Syria is a dictatorship run by the Alawite minority. The Alawites are, technically, a Shia sect, and for that reason, Iran subsidizes them. The majority of Syrians are Sunni Moslems. The Alawites have continued to run the nation because they established an efficient police state, and they get enough money from Iran to keep the ramshackle thing going. But the Israeli army could put the Alawites out of business in short order, and turn the place over to the UN for democratic elections (the first in nearly half a century). That would put Sunni Arabs back in power, and eliminate support for Shia Hizbollah.

There’s one catch with Syria. Over the last two decades, Syria has invested some of its scan resources in one segment of its armed forces. As a result, Syria has a force of several hundred ballistic missiles, all of which can reach deep into Israel. Syria also has chemical weapons (nerve gas, and others). An attack on Syria puts Israel at risk of taking a few hits from Syrian ballistic missiles armed with chemical warheads. While Israel has its Arrow anti-ballistic missile system, a dozen missiles fired at once could overwhelm it. The risk is several thousand dead Israeli civilians, maybe more. But maybe none, if Israeli plans to take out the Syrian missile forces work. But in the aftermath of this Summers fighting, Israeli planners may have a new respect for possible deceptions and techniques for hiding missiles from attack.

The “big war” strategy has other costs. Mobilizing the entire Israeli armed forces means shutting down much of the Israeli economy, because so many key people are reservists. There is also the risk, however slight, of other Arab states declaring war on Israel. This risk is slight because those other Arab states are Sunni Moslem, and welcome the removal of Iran backed Shia entities (Hizbollah and Syria). But the risk is there.

There’s always risk, it’s a question of which one you estimate will do you the most good. Israel still has the “big war” option available, and Lebanon and Syria know it. If the small war option doesn’t work out, Hizbollah, Lebanon, Syria and Iran know what comes next.

Losses in Lebanon
Strategy Page
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htatrit/articles/20060819.aspx

August 19, 2006

Hizbollah does not publish any data on its armed strength. But it is known that, basically, Hizbollah’s fighters are a reservist organization. There are about 3-4,000 “active” reservists available for full-time duty, and another 10,000 or so “inactive” reservists, who have some weapons training, and are only activated in the most serious emergencies (like the recent war). Most of the time, 500-1,000 of the active reservists are on duty full time. In addition to watching the Lebanese border, there are facilities in the Bekaa valley and in Beirut that need guarding. Some inactive reservists pull guard duty as their “civilian” job, but these fellows are operating as security guards, not soldiers. Keep in mind that Hizbollah is drawing its military manpower from a population of only about 1.3 million Shia (whose defense is the main reason for Hizbollah existing). So they have about one percent of the population armed. That’s about 50 percent more (as a fraction of the population), than the United States, and much higher than most nations. However, Israel has about nine percent of its population (80 percent of them reservists) under arms, and Syria has about three percent of its population under arms. The Middle East is a much more heavily armed region, than any other.

Unofficial reports from the Israelis indicate that nearly 600 Hizbollah fighters were killed, and probably about 1,500 wounded. Some of these were inactive reservists called up to perform civil defense and security functions. The rockets were apparently being fired by a dozen or so teams (of ten to twenty men) who were trained to take the rockets from their hiding places, set them up, and fire them. This was dangerous work, and these rocket teams apparently suffered heavy casualties.

Less well trained teams appear to have been called in towards the end, because, although the number of rockets fired each night didn’t decline much, the accuracy did. On the last night, some 250 rockets were fired, and few hit anything of value. That last bunch of rockets killed one Israeli, and wounded a few dozen others. Hizbollah also suffered a lot of casualties in Beirut, and various other military facilities they had throughout southern and central Lebanon.

Israel, as usual, is not talking about it’s targeting, but they had UAVs, aircraft, helicopters and satellite coverage of southern Lebanon. Israeli aircraft always had plenty of military targets to hit. They also had lots of their commandoes in action up there, most of them just quietly scouting, and calling in smart bomb strikes. The true extent of the damage suffered by Hizbollah won’t be known until one of their senior officials defects or gets captured, or when the organization is destroyed and some of its files captured.

Israeli losses were miniscule. It only mobilized about 30,000 troops. The Northern Command, which covers the Lebanese and Syrian border, has a full strength of over 200,000 troops, if there is a full mobilization. Israel lost about a 120 soldiers killed, and another few hundred wounded. Thus it suffered about eight casualties per division per day. That’s a little higher than what American troops suffered during the 2003 invasion of Iraq, but a lot less than they suffered during the 1967 Six Day War (110 per division per day) or the 1973 war (90).

Thus for the forces involved, the Israelis suffered about 1.6 percent casualties for the entire 2006 campaign, while Hizbollah suffered some 13 percent casualties. Economic casualties were also lopsided, with Lebanon losing at least ten percent of GDP, versus 1.5 percent for Israel. However, since the Israeli attacks concentrated on Hizbollah, and tended to avoid the Lebanese Christians, it appears that the Hizbollah population lost up to half their GPD. Israel will recover within a year, the Hizbollah areas will take several years.

Israeli Soldier Dies After IDF Conducts Raid on Hezbollah Stronghold
Fox News
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,209419,00.html

Saturday, August 19, 2006


Aug. 19:Israeli soldiers display an Israeli flag while returning from southern Lebanon into Israel near Kibbutz Malkiya.
http://www.ww2incolor.com/forum/showpost.php?p=86867&postcount=124


Israeli Defense Forces troops return from southern Lebanon.
http://www.ww2incolor.com/forum/showpost.php?p=86867&postcount=124

Associated Press

BEIRUT, Lebanon — Hezbollah fighters battled Israeli commandos who launched a raid near the militants’ stronghold deep inside Lebanon early Saturday, killing one soldier, in what Lebanon called the first large-scale violation of the U.N.-brokered cease-fire between the sides.

Israel said the pre-dawn assault outside the eastern town of Baalbek was aimed at disrupting arms smuggling to Hezbollah from Iran and Syria.

Witnesses said Israeli missiles destroyed a bridge during the raid — the first such airstrike since the cease-fire began.

But there was no immediate escalation in the fighting, raising hopes for the 6-day-old truce as the United Nations pleaded for nations to contribute to an international peacekeeping force due to patrol southern Lebanon.

The first small contingent of reinforcements for the peacekeeping force — 49 French soldiers — landed Saturday at the southern Lebanese coastal town of Naqoura, with 200 more expected next week.

But Deputy Secretary-General Mark Malloch Brown said more countries need to step forward to fill out a vanguard of 3,500 troops that the U.N. wants on the ground by Aug. 28 to help ensure that the truce between Israel and Lebanon holds after 34 days of warfare.

Lebanese Prime Minister Fuad Saniora called Saturday’s commando raid a “flagrant violation” of the cease-fire, and said he would take the issue up with U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan.

Under the cease-fire terms, Israel has said it will conduct defensive operations if its troops are threatened. But the raid took place far from positions of Israeli troops in southern Lebanon.

The Israeli military said such operations would continue until “an effective monitoring unit” was in place to prevent Hezbollah from rebuilding its arsenal.

“If the Syrians and Iran continue to arm Hezbollah in violation of the (U.N. cease-fire) resolution, Israel is entitled to act to defend the principle of the arms embargo,” Israeli foreign ministry spokesman Mark Regev said. “Once the Lebanese army and the international forces are active … then such Israeli activity will become superfluous.”

Such a bold operation, risking the cease-fire, suggested Israel was going after a major target near Baalbek — perhaps to rescue two Israeli soldiers snatched by Hezbollah on July 12, or to try to capture a senior guerrilla official to trade for the soldiers.

Hezbollah has said it wants to exchange the two soldiers for Arab prisoners, but the U.N. cease-fire resolution demands Hezbollah unconditionally release the soldiers.

The Israeli commandos dropped by helicopter on a hill outside the village of Boudai west of Baalbek and apparently were seeking a guerrilla target in a nearby school, Lebanese security officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to release information to the media.

Local media said Sheik Mohammed Yazbeck, a senior Hezbollah official in the Bekaa and a member of the Shura council of the group, may have been the target. Yazbeck is a native of Boudai.

Hezbollah TV said the guerrillas foiled the raid. Israel said one of its military officers was killed and two other soldiers were wounded, but that the force completed its mission.

Lebanese security officials said three guerrillas were killed and three wounded, but a Hezbollah spokesman said there were no deaths among his fighters.

The landing party brought with it two vehicles that were later withdrawn after clashes, the Bekaa Valley’s governor Antoine Suleiman told the privately owned Voice of Lebanon radio station.

Overflights from Israeli jet fighters drowned the clatter of helicopters as they flew into the foothills of the central Lebanese mountains, dropping commandos and the two vehicles, Hezbollah officials on the scene said.

The commandos then drove into Boudai, and when Hezbollah fighters intercepted them in a field, the commandos identified themselves as the Lebanese army, ( http://www.ww2incolor.com/forum/showpost.php?p=86973&postcount=141 ) the officials said. The guerrillas grew suspicious and gunfire erupted, they said.

Israeli helicopters fired missiles as the commandos withdrew and flew out of the area an hour later.

Witnesses saw bandages and syringes at the landing site outside Boudai, about 9.5 miles west of Baalbek and about 16 miles west of the Syrian border, indicating there were casualties among the Israelis. A bridge was destroyed about yards from the area in what witnesses said was an Israeli airstrike.

Baalbek is the birthplace of the Iranian and Syrian-backed Hezbollah. The area in the eastern Bekaa Valley, 60 miles north of the Israeli border, is a major guerrilla stronghold.

On Aug. 2, Israeli commandos targeted the Iranian-funded, Hezbollah-run Dar al-Hikma Hospital in Baalbek. The commando assault and Israeli strikes around the ancient town killed 16 people, according to Lebanese police. Baalbek residents said the Israelis took four people as prisoners, and that none were Hezbollah fighters.

Israel had said the building was a Hezbollah base, not a hospital, and that its soldiers captured five guerrilla fighters and killed 10 others before withdrawing.

Lebanese Foreign Minister Fawzi Salloukh told reporters he protested the Israeli violation in talks with U.N. envoy Terje Roed-Larsen in Beirut on Saturday and said the U.N. team would raise the issue with Israeli authorities.

“If Israel continues its violations, it is the responsibility of the (U.N.) Security Council to take action and ask Israel to stop these violations,” Salloukh said.

Also Saturday, a Lebanese civilian was killed when unexploded Israeli munitions from the offensive detonated in the village of Ras al-Ein, outside Tyre, said the Syrian Baath Party, of which the man was a member.

Roed-Larsen said the cease-fire brought a “huge opportunity” for the Lebanese government to extend its authority over southern Lebanon, which has been dominated for years by Hezbollah guerrillas.

Under the cease-fire plan, some 15,000 Lebanese troops are to move into the south, backed by the beefed-up U.N. peacekeeping force known as UNIFIL, as Israeli forces withdraw. Once there, the troops are to enforce the cease-fire, and Lebanon has said Hezbollah will not be allowed to bring its weapons out in public — though it has not said whether it will try the more controversial step of disarming the guerrillas.

The Lebanese army has deployed more than 1,500 troops in three sectors that Israeli forces have left, and the U.N. force — which currently numbers 2,000 — has set up checkpoints and started patrolling the areas, he said.

The 49 French troops that landed by inflatable dinghy at Naqoura were the first forces in the planned expansion of UNIFIL, which is planned to reach 15,000 soldiers.

So far, Italy and Finland have promised troops — and in an effort to encourage more countries to sign on, Annan said the peacekeeping force would not “wage war” on Israel, Lebanon, or Hezbollah militants.

“It is not expected to achieve by force what must be realized through negotiation and an internal Lebanese consensus,” Annan said in a report to the U.N. Security Council on implementation of the Aug. 11 cease-fire resolution.

A key concern of many countries is whether the U.N. force will be called on to disarm Hezbollah fighters, as called for in a September 2004 U.N. resolution. They want to study the rules of engagement and concept of operations for the force, which were distributed Friday, before making a decision on troops.

Malloch Brown said countries needed to understand that the force would not be offensive. “It’s not going to go in there and attempt large-scale disarmament,” he said.

Hezbollah salute.

It rings strange connotations… am I right?

Lancer44

You are correct Lancer. Hitler has had admirers throughout the Moslem world even from the time that he came to power.

You might find the following interesting:

Mohammad Amin al-Husayni
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amin_al-Husayni

Mohammad Amin al-Husayni, the Mufti of Jerusalem, was a Palestinian Arab nationalist and a Muslim religious leader. Known for his anti-Zionism, al-Husayni fought against the establishment of a Jewish state in the territory of the British Mandate of Palestine. To this end, Husayni collaborated with Nazi Germany during World War II and helped recruit Muslims for the Waffen-SS. Recent Nazi documents uncovered from the German Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Military Archive Service in Freiburg [1] by two researchers from Stuttgart University show that the Nazis had intended to exploit Arab friendship for their planned landing in Palestine and their accompanying plan to murder about 500,000 European Jews who had taken refuge there. In their book the researchers concluded that “The most important collaborator with the Nazis and an absolute Arab anti-Semite was Haj Amin al-Husseini, the mufti of Jerusalem”…(the article continues)


Picture of Amin Al Husseini in his uniform as an Officer of the Ottoman Empire. He was posted in Smyrna where Armenian Christians were mass-murdered by the Ottoman Army. The defeat of the Ottoman Empire marked the end of Islamic rule at the hands of the secular Kamal Ataturk and left behind a taste for revenge in the heart of Amin Al Husseini.
http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/gallery/pages/Ottoman-officer_jpg_jpg_jpg.htm

Interesting that Amin Al-Husseini was a Turkish officer during the First World War and participated in Armenian Genocide.

1914-1917 Husseini’s First Taste of Jihad - Allegiance to Ottoman Empire.
Amin Al-Husseini swears allegiance to the Ottoman Empire during the Armenian genocide. He is an officer stationed in Smyrna and participates first-hand in the Armenian genocide. One and a half million Christians are slaughtered under the sword of Islamic Jihad by the Ottoman Army. Allegiance to Ottoman Empire and Islamic world take-over will be echoed by Osama Bin Laden in his post-September 11th declaration.

Tell Children the Truth
http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/
Amin Al-Husseini, the mufti of Jerusalem
http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/amin_en.html
Yasser Arafat
http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/arafat_en.html
Saddam Hussein
http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/saddam_en.html
Moslem Brotherhood
http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/mbhood_en.html
Osama Bin Laden
http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/osama_en.html
Blogs
http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/blog/
Photo Gallery
http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/gallery/index.html

Mein Kampf, written by Adolf Hitler, is a best-seller in the Arab World. It is distributed by the Palestinian Authority [formerly] headed by [the late] Yasser Arafat. Yasser Arafat became the disciple of Amin Al Husseini at the age of 17.

http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/gallery/pages/6-Mein%20Kampf_jpg_jpg_jpg.htm

The Arab/Muslim Nazi Connection
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a8ff1c12efe.htm

Postwar Arab links to the ODESSA network
http://www.fantompowa.net/Flame/nazis_postwar_egypt.htm

Most people assume that when Nazi’s fled Europe after the war most of them went to Latin America, where the ruling elite’s - such as the Peron’s in Argentina - had always been sympathetic to Nazi ideology. Many did, but a sizable number of others found work in Egypt, notably under the regime of Gamal Abdal Nasser (1918-1970), an Egyptian army officer and political leader, who was the first president of the republic of Egypt (1956-70). In 1952 he led the coup that deposed King Farouk (another Nazi sympathizer), and later became premier (1954), and president (1956). Hitler had enjoyed quite a following among the nationalist youth of Egypt during the war, after Nassiri Nasser, the brother of Gamal had published an Arab edition of Mein Kampf in 1939, describing its author as the “strongest man of Europe”.

The Nazi-Arab connection started by the Mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Amin al-Husseini, continued after the war according to Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke writing in Hitler’s Priestess: Savitri Devi, the Hindu-Aryan myth, and Neo-Nazism (New York University Press, New York, USA, 1998). The Middle East had emerged as a haven for Nazis fleeing Europe in the 1950s, which had its roots in the anti-British and pro-Nazi attitudes of Vichy Syria, Rashid Ali in Iraq, King Farouk of Egypt and the Mufti of Jerusalem…(the article continues)

Walid Shoebat
From Hate to Love
(former Palestinian Arab terrorist)
http://www.shoebat.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=370b6cb9725cf8f7d79bc4eb5e6da338

Running From Responsibility
Strategy Page
http://www.strategypage.com/qnd/israel/articles/20060820.aspx

August 19, 2006

Turkey said that it was forcing Iranian air transports, suspected of carrying weapons, to land and be searched, before being allowed to proceed to Syria. However, not all large transports are searched, and it is known from reports out of Syria, that military personnel and weapons are still being flown from Iran to Syria.

August 20, 2006

The ceasefire deal is coming apart more quickly than originally expected. The European nations, which had originally promised combat troops, and a willingness to enforce the ceasefire in southern Lebanon (that is, disarm Hizbollah) are rapidly backpedaling. France, which had talked about leading the peacekeepers, and providing thousands of troops, when the ceasefire was being pushed through the UN, now offers 200 troops, and wants no part of leading the operation.

This is angering the UN, because everyone admits that only the well trained, and fairly incorruptible, European soldiers stand a chance of being able to disarm Hizbollah and assure peace in Lebanon. At the moment, most of the nations offering troops are Moslem. These soldiers would not crack down on Hizbollah, and would assure another round of fighting between Israel and the terrorists. The UN wants 3,500 peacekeepers in place by August 28th, and all 15,000 by late November. So far, it appears that this will not happen. The UN continues to appeal for troops, and condemn Israeli efforts to enforce the ceasefire conditions (that Hizbollah not rearm and reoccupy bases in southern Lebanon.) As in the past, the UN will pass resolutions demanding action, but will do nothing, except criticize Israel for defending itself.

Meanwhile, Israel has said it will maintain the ceasefire conditions until an effective peacekeeping force arrives in southern Lebanon. To this end, Israel sent a force of commandos, by helicopter, to a spot near the Syrian border. There was gunfire and explosions, and casualties, and the commandos flew out.

The Lebanese army has sent 1,500 troops to three areas that Israeli troops have withdrawn from. But the Lebanese government has already said that it will use force on Hizbollah. As in the past, Hizbollah will be allowed to bully its way through any Lebanese government officials.

The UN won’t enforce the ceasefire, nor will Lebanon. Both will criticize Israeli efforts to enforce the ceasefire. That criticism is discouraging any European nations from joining the peacekeeping force. Fighting Hizbollah is seen as a losing proposition. Hizbollah will organize some dead civilians, and any force that fights Hizbollah will automatically become bad guys in the eyes of the mass media and the Moslem world.

However, Hizbollah media deception tactics are themselves becoming news, thus making Hizbollahs Information War efforts less effective. However, in the Moslem world, Hizbollah can still do no wrong. But 40 percent of Lebanese are not Moslem, but Christians. The Lebanese Christians are pressuring the other anti-Hizbollah minorities (Druze and Sunni) to back an effort to disarm Hizbollah. So far, no one wants to risk it. Most everyone is running from any responsibility for dealing with Hizbollah.

The Shah and Hizbollah
Strategy Page
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htinf/articles/20060821.aspx

August 21, 2006

Hizbollah has been training infantry fighters for over twenty years. This effort has paid off, especially since Hizbollah had the advantage of receiving Iranian trainers and advisors. Despite the 1979 revolution, and witch hunts of the 1980s, the Iranian military still retains a lot of the good training habits, many passed on to them by American trainers over several decades, back when the Shah ran the country. Moreover, the Iranians have long been the most effective soldiers in the region. So there really shouldn’t have been any surprise in what happened in south Lebanon, when some of the Hizbollah gunmen offered stiff resistance against Israeli infantry.

Hizbollah is one of the few Arab armies to really train its troops to professional standards. Israeli intelligence appears to have realized this. Prior to the Israeli operation in southern Lebanon, there were reports that Hizbollah had some of the best trained troops in the Middle East. Even that dumb-looking jogging march they do suggested that; as it takes time and discipline to get people to perform that particular exercise. Apparently senior Israeli military personnel chose to assume the intel assessments were inflated; “After all, they’re only another bunch of Arabs.”

The Israeli troops who have been operating on the Lebanese border for the last two decades knew better. The Israeli have over a decade of experience fighting Hizbollah, and the brigades in northern Israel knew what they were up against. But, somehow, this information tended to evaporate as it traveled south. Many Israeli generals, journalists and politicians continued to think Hizbollah would be little more than a road bump, if the Israeli army decided to go north. As it turned out, Hizbollah was not a particularly substantial opponent, but they did provide more resistance than the generals, but not the Israeli reservists from northern Israel, expected.

Hizbollah was more professional than most Arab troops in a number of important ways. For one thing, they took good care of their weapons. They worked out combat drills that took into account Israeli tactics. Most importantly, junior leaders were trained to act alone, something most Arab armies discourage.

The Hizbollah experience is not likely to influence other Arab armies, mainly because Hizbollah sees itself on a Mission From God, and thus able to discard ancient customs. Most Arabs are reluctant to do this, and continue to produce inept infantry.