Yes, and even if a weapon was made by the lowest bidder, it wasn’t always made to the lowest price, as endless defence blowouts prove.
Glib comments like the above about weapons supposedly being made cheaply by the lowest bidder can be attached to good weapons which performed badly for reasons entirely unrelated to tender price or design.
The M16 in Vietnam is a perfect example.
Good weapon, good design, well built, wrongly accused of being made by Mattel Toy Corporation to exemplify its allegedly shoddy nature.
Just destroyed by government / military idiots specifying cheaper ball powder rather then the manufacturer’s carefully calculated powder for the load and efficient operation.
Killed a lot of grunts for fractions of cents a load, but it had nothing to do with cheap tenders or bad manufacture and everything to do with bean counters in administration imposing their ill-informed views on ordnance and military matters.