You blundered. You are comparing 2 specific firearms. Between autos and bolt-actions, there is a marginal difference. I did say marginal, and that is what I said originally. :lol: If you want to see this difference magnified, compare cannons which are breech-loading to auto-loading cannons.
Again patent Clerk, you try to twist my words. You have attempted to make it appear as though i said there is a sensible difference, when i said there is a marginal difference. Please patent clerk, don;t try twisting other people’s words. it’s a habit for you, but it always leads to your saying something goofy and then proven wrong about your exagerations.
However!:
Fullton Armory:
"Theoretically, the .308 has an ever so slight advantage due to the decreased case volume (the powder does not move around much in a .308 case; more modern powders allow less to be used for similar performance. In the .30-'06 case, the powder has lots of room to lay a bit differently on each shot fired). However, in the DCM/CMP Service Rifle course of fire, such “differences” evaporate for most shooters. However, at long range (e.g., 1000 yards) the .30-06 catridge offers a real advantage, though, not remarkably.
http://www.fulton-armory.com/M1_308.htm
On the other hand, the .30-'06 cartridge has the wonderful ability to offer a little bit more power at reduced chamber pressure levels. Though it seems odd that the .30-06 has less chamber pressures than the .308 and yet a bit more “power,” it’s nonetheless true."
NOT REMARKABLY Stoat. Like the difference between autos and bolties. Are you getting the picture? Now make sure you take that information and exaggerate it too. Say something to make it look like the Fulton Armory is saying that the diff between the 308 and 06 are significant. Go on! Do it Stoaty! You can do it! :lol:
I’ve driven a race car too, but I’m no expert on them either. Sorry Stoat, but experts say one is the inspiration for the other. You and I have had this debate before, and I proved you wrong before. Shall I do it again?
Take it from me Stoat. It is capable of passing theough a man at near PB if it does not hit bone. A cop in my city died from one recently. Shot in the stomach, the bullet passed clean through him, missing his spine. He bled to death internally in 20 minutes because it passed through his stomach. Quite a few people have been killed with .22 LR’s just that way. If you don’t believe that, it’s your little problem. But, you are wrong.
Stoat, here’s a tip for you: The reason so many larger calibre bullets stop inside someone is because they have low velocity, like a 9mm parabellum, a 380, or a .30 short. While they might do a lot of damage going in, these rounds seldom have the velocity to pass completely through someone. This is not always the case with the small, high velocity .22 LR, especially if it is fired from a long pistol or a rifle.
A 9mm pistol typically has lower velocity and it is a much fatter bullet than a HV .22 LR, which is far more likely, but only sometimes will, pass clean through a man. Yes Stoat. A HV .22 LR can pass completely through a man. They have many times.
Learning Stoaty? Good.
Stoat, most automatic rifles use a rotating bolt. :lol:
Do you think they are all based on each other’s designs?
Are they all children of each other? :shock:
OK, now, let’s shoot down the myth you’ve fallen prey to about the M1 Carbine being based on the M1 Garand:
Desipite similarities in naming, there is no relationship between the M1 Garand and the M1 Carbine.
http://www.answers.com/topic/garand
The M1 Carbine is often thought of as a variant of the Garand, but this is actually a misnomer.
http://garand.biography.ms/
The Carbine was one of over twenty designs submitted to the Government. It took over a year and a half to decide on this example.
http://home.att.net/~ra-carbines/history.html
The gun was the brainchild of David M. “Carbine” Williams who apparently did much of his design work for the carbine while serving time for “moonshining”. Later Williams helped engineers at Winchester perfect his basic design.
http://duncanlong.com/science-fiction-fantasy-short-stories/m1.htm
Many companies submitted their designs for US Army trials but the winner eventually became the Winchester. The design of the Winchester carbine is often contributed to the David “Carbine” Williams, who was the developer of the gas system. But, according to some sources, this carbine was born as a spare-time hunting carbine project of some engineers at Winchesters’ workshop, and, when military request appeared, this design was resurrected and adopted for intended use.
http://world.guns.ru/rifle/rfl08-e.htm
So now Stoat, patent office clerk, again, you are wrong.
The M1 Carbine is NOT based on the M1 Garand. You read the myth and fell for it. Furthermore, you think that because there are similarities between the bolts in 2 guns that one is based on the other. Once more Stoat, patent office clerk, if that were true, then every rifle would be based on the design of every other of it’s kind, which is not true either.
Stoat, that’s just the way it is.
