One for the WW2incolor vets this.
follow the links to find Erwin (55heroes) continuing the Invincible sunk malrarky…
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread166587/pg1
and Irish Duck (Irish Duck)
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.
One for the WW2incolor vets this.
follow the links to find Erwin (55heroes) continuing the Invincible sunk malrarky…
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread166587/pg1
and Irish Duck (Irish Duck)
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.
That brings back warm fuzzy memories of absolutely idiocy!
any veracity does not exist on the matter. the single one it was damaged not sunk :arrow:
^^^^
Repeating this ad infinitum in multiple threads does not make any more true than AIDES’s claims either!
Guys I know this is about AIDES but its going to get very complicated very soon with the double postings, especially about the Invincible.
Maybe we should just have one thread for the Invincible, and indeed anything else even if it is related to or comes from AIDES?
Any thoughts?
Way ahead of you Firefly.
i have started an Invincible thread.
Could you shunt some of the posts in to it Firefly? I don’t know how to do it, or even if I can.
Only by quoting them in the new thread.
Edited: Quoting, because anyone could see who posted in first instance.
I disagree with cut&paste in this case.
After quoting, the original posts could be deleted.
[b]Guys - we now have 3 seperate Invincible Topics!
1000yd stare has quoted all the Invincible statements in the appropriate thread and I have deleted the posts from here. I’m not really sure that this topic should exist, any thoughts?[/b]
In future can we keep all Topics in the same area where practicable.
Seems that this is not the Falklands/Malvinas room but the “Invincible” room. :roll: