Bf-109E3 Profiles

Bf-109-E3 Stab1/JG1 1941.

Bf-109-E3 III/JG2 1940.

Bf-109-E3 4/JG26 1940.

Bf-109-E3 9/JG26 1940.

Bf-109-E3 III/JG27 1940.

Bf-109-E3 3/JG51 1940.

Bf-109-E3 6/JG51 1940.

Bf-109-E3 I/Stab1/JG51 1939.

Bf-109-E3 2/JG52 1940.

Bf-109-E3 2/JG52 1940.

Bf-109-E3 3/JG52 1940.

Bf-109-E3 3/JG52 1941.

Bf-109-E3 1/JG53 1940.

Bf-109-E3 2/JG77 1939.

Bf-109-E3 4/JG77 1940.

Bf-109-E3 Grupul 7 Romanian Air Force 1941.

Bf-109-E3 Grupul 7 Romanian Air Force 1941.

Bf-109-E3 Grupul 7 Romanian Air Force 1941.

Bf-109-E3 Swiss Air Force 1940.

Bf-109-E3 Swiss Air Force 1945.

Yay! New planes!!! I like the Swiss ones.

Beautiful work !

Very nice.Is there a book we can buy to see your work Clave?

Or a website?

…the power of Google;)

http://www.clavework-graphics.co.uk/

and advertsing…

Nice…

The 109’s look very nice. Are you using Illustrator?

Thanks.I’ve put it in my favorite.

Yup. He sure is. I took a computer arts class in school and we used it. None of us were as good as Clave, but I remember enough to know that that’s Illustrator.

@ Kamehouse: Hahaha, me too. :smiley:

:mrgreen: Haha, thanks! I like the ‘power of Google’ bit…

Oh… I have a teaser for my next project:

wheel.jpg

Stuka?

heinkel he-51

he51-131.jpg

looks like the indiana jones biplane

I do allot of graphic design myself, and although I use adobe the same thing can be achieved using Corel Draw and Photopaint. It is excellent work however.

I’m not sold to Adobe (they tend to bloat their software “à la microsoft”, a sickness called “featuritis®”), but, having worked in graphic design for the last 17 years, I strongly disagree… I thought corel draw was dead for some years, Photopaint???
Come on, you can’t be serious???:shock:

Corel is hardly dead, and I know of allot of graphic artists that still use it. Photopaint works like Photoshop allowing you to make some of the camo designs I see painted on the aircraft.
I am curious if you are not sold on adobe what software do you use?

When I say I’m not sold, I don’t mean I don’t use it;)
It’s just that the latests upgrade seems more and more jammed with questionable features, which cause the reorganisation of all menus, which piss me off a bit.
For example, I loved photoshop 7. When migrating to OS X, we had to buy the “Creative Suite” (a cleaver way to force people to fork out $$$ and get yucky Indesign to try to kill Quark X Press) CS1 sucked big time ! CS2 is better, but I worked with CS3 and moved back to CS2.
Hope this help to clarify what I mean…

Yes it does, I like CS3 myself. The ability to load 3D models comes in handy. Although I do not like the fact that image ready was canceled. Because of that I still keep both CS2 and CS3 versions of photoshop installed. Interesting perspective on In Design and Quark. Since I have never had a Mac I never got used to Quark.