Yes, I was drunk. I was toasting the Allied War Dead with fine Crystal Vodka!
But I said “heavy casualties,” not battle ‘deaths.’ Indeed, I was shocked when I read that number recently, and had to check the percentages of deaths to the wounded.
My source is John Keegan’s “The Second World War”:
The cost to the Red Army of its victory in the siege of Berlin had also been terrible. Between 16 April and 8 May, Zhukov, Konev and Rokossovsky’s fronts had lost 304,887 men killed, wounded and missing…the heaviest casualty list suffered by any Red Army in any battle of the war (with exception of the captive toll on the great encirclement battles of 1941).
(p. 533)
Remember kids, “casualties” and “deaths” are not the same thing…