They really do have some amazing photos on there,which are free to save as long as they aren`t used for commercial purposes.
I am spending a lot of time on there!
They say 97 % of the photos in their archives have never been published.
I understand,and Im not a big fan of water marks either. However,as these things go,they could be much worse. They do keep them in the lower Rt hand corner,and the WMs arent in some garish color.
I still find this a fabulous resource,in spite of the WMs.
Also the fact that they offer these in a nice size that still doesn`t use too much disc space to save them,is pretty cool.
You might be able to help me find what has been presented as a Life picture on several websites, but I’m a bit sceptical about it.
It’s Natalie Nickerson in this link http://www.codoh.com/atro/atrocity.html , gazing at a supposedly Japanese skull supposedly sent to her by her boyfriend in the Pacific.
I haven’t been able to find it by trying to seach Life.
Can you find it on the Life site, or otherwise verify it, or disqualify it, as a genuine Life photo?
If you look at the men first and third from the right you’ll see that their ties have obscured their rifles but that the ties are faint, while the stock is visible behind the tie of the bloke third from left.
This indicates that wind blew the ties which moved around a bit during a relatively long exposure time which was short enough to capture the men crisply but long enough to be unable to stop the movement of the ties.
You will also notice that everything on the ship is in good focus, although it falls off a bit in the background. This indicates a smallish lens aperture which gives good depth of field (sharpness into the distance) but also requires longer exposure times to burn the image into the film.
As a general rule with film of that era, and much later whether colour or black and white, you got better defined images with smaller apertures and longer exposures, but any movement (such as ties blowing in the wind) won’t be frozen in the image.
May 22, 1944. I’ve got the issue. It’s a full page black and white photo, labeled Photo of the Week.
Caption reads: (portions…I didn’t type the whole thing…)
“When he said goodby two years ago to Natalie Nickerson, 20, a war worker of Phoenix…Last week Natalie received a human skull, autographed by her lieutenant and 13 friends, and inscribed…‘picked up on the New guinea beach’…Natalie, suprised at the gift, named it Tojo. The armed forces disapprove strongly of this sort of thing.”