Reported Post by Rising Sun*

[Rising_Sun]

Rising Sun* has reported a post.

Reason:

Upon reflection, and particularly as I expressed in this reported post, I think herman may be someone with a genuine intellectual problem. This would explain his persistent inability, or refusal, to understand what he says and our responses to it.

Or he could just be a moronic, or even highly sophisticated, troll.

He’s been given vastly more latitude than anyone else would get.

I’m inclined to give him a last chance, although it won’t come from me as he thinks I’m persecuting him, and be done with him and his ultimately uninformative posts.

Post: WWII Aircraft
Forum: General WWII Discussion
Assigned Moderators: pdf27, George Eller, Nickdfresh, Rising Sun*, tankgeezer, flamethrowerguy

Posted by: Rising Sun*
Original Content:

@herman2

But I thought the Lancaster was the meat and potatoes of the English RAF and that they built thousands of them in England and that Canada merely assisted in selling them by building several hundred of them. Or do you mean the Lanc AFTER the war?

leccy said

I was based at RAF Conningsby from 2000 to 2004 where the ‘City of Lincoln’ was, amazing aircraft to fly in (managed to squeeze myself in the rear gunners turret) - unusual fact about it though is that it can not carry passengers as it is still registered as a bomber in the RAF.

At the time the Canadian Lanc was non airworthy having to go through some extensive restoration to keep her airworthy.

To a person of average comprehension, leccy’s statement that “at the time”, being 2000 to 2004, would suggest rather strongly that he was referring to, as you wondered, “the Lanc AFTER the war”.

I am, and perhaps others are, beginning to see why so many of your posts are those of a person whose thought processes are somewhat different to the rest of us.