The next EU (Eurasian Union).

What chance of Putin’s Panzers rolling towards Kiev ? JR.:shock:

I doubt anything major will happen. Angry declarations will be all. I doubt NATO would allow Russia to invade the Ukraine… That and I doubt the Asian powers would be open to the idea.

Tend to agree, Churchill. We are already going through a sort of mini-Ice Age type Cold War; direct intervention on the part of Russia in the Ukraine would turn down the temperature further in a big way. But then … why would Grand Prince Vlad need to send in the tanks ? His economic hold over the Ukraine is very substantial. All he needs to do is threaten to turn off the gas, and the Ukrainian regime will shout “how high ?”. However, it leaves the present Ukrainian government in a pretty pickle. Indications are that if an election were held now, the pro-Brussels factions would win. It will be interesting to see how this pans out.

As for the old idea of constructing a “Eurasian Union” dominated by Russia - Vlad has been pretty open in the past in supporting a revival in such a development. This would clash directly with the aspiration of the European Union’s “Central Powers” of expansion to the East; of Turkey’s (equally time-honoured) aspiration for a Turcic sphere of influence in what used to be the southern Soviet Union; and perhaps even China’s (again, long-held) concerns for its northern border territories. Interesting times in the East ? Not too interesting, I hope … Best regards, JR.

Interesting thoughts. I think one thing that should be mentioned is that The Ukraine is not Georgia, and an armed intervention would be more or less a bloodbath as it wouldn’t be a walkover. The Russians cannot even fully pacify Chechnya and the surrounding territories, I think a foray into a nation with one of Europe’s more powerful militaries would be a severe mistake on the part of any Russian gov’t. It would also be supremely ill-advised with the upcoming Sochi Games already fraught with security controversies…

I don’t disagree with anything above, but the unfortunate experience of history is that nations routinely do stupid things, as evidenced by my current reading on the Suez catastrophe when Britain and France thought they could knock off Nasser & Co.

Unlike the Soviet (and more recent Western) foray into Afghanistan?

We have the seeds of another severe mistake building down here, thanks to our idiot and inexperienced Prime Minister thinking that pretending to have big balls and issuing stupid nationalistic bluster is the way to deal with Indonesia, which is starting to respond in equally stupid kind.

Anything is possible in international relations, largely because the egos of people involved in them are unrestrained and conceited as they play to the idiot class which is influenced by their bullshit.


them.gif

One consolation is that the use of nukes at such close quarters is out of the question. Iraq and Afghanistan are hardly encouraging precedents, but one would definitely hope that this already messy situation stops short of panzers. Even without nukes, “direct action” on anybody’s part would produce a truly awful mess. As far as I can make out, a large part of the Ukrainian population, especially in western Ukraine, are far from enamored of Russia. These people look towards the European Union (even in some cases towards Poland), while eastern Ukrainians are more likely to be Russophiles. Apart from simple geography, these orientations trace themselves back to divisions created by empires long dead. An "intervention - by anyone - could well produce a situation of civil war piled on top of invasion and resistance - and all in a part of the world very much more sensitive, if one thinks about it, even than the Middle East. Afghanistan might well be put in the ha’penny place. Perhaps it is just as well that Tsar Vlad has his fingers on the gas tap … at least in this case. Best regards, JR.

Was watching a tv documentary about alleged corruption and oppressive practices surrounding the upcoming Winter Olympics in Russia. It featured Tsar Vlad at some sort of reception in a magnificent room in the Kremlin, walking down the world’s longest red carpet between hordes of groveling sycophants. The Tsars of old would have been green with envy if they could see it. I wonder - has Vlad lost some of his contact with common reality ? Not that I would suggest such a thing, were I in Russia … Best regards, JR.

The same could be said of the US President and the Queen of England doing various ceremonial things.

The difference is the interpretation we place on their and Vlad’s conduct, with the knowledge that Vlad is a semi-dictator presiding over a magnificently corrupt system (as distinct from the astonishingly corrupt system in that other jewel in the communist crown, China) where those who fall out of favour can be imprisoned and stripped of wealth on various pretexts.

Whereas in America and Britain the systems are only semi-corrupt and those who fall out of favour are rarely stripped of their ill-gotten gains, let alone imprisoned, because in the West the free market is free of the arbitrary dictatorial and semi-dictatorial constraints, confiscations and penalties imposed by authoritarian regimes.

What now, I wonder ? Russia humiliates the EU and appears to have won the diplomatic battle for hegemony over the Ukraine, but the whole thing is thrown back into the balance by a popular uprising in western Ukraine, followed by what can only be described as a coup d’état (it remains at this point to emerge who is actually pulling the strings). And the Russian Ambassador called back to Moscow for consultations. A bit like the “good old days” ? Not that this is a real victory for the EU - it leaves Brussels with the prospect of having to supply a very large amount of money to save the Ukrainian economy from collapse. Oh well, I suppose Mr Draghi and his fellows at the ECB will have to print a few zillion more Euros of funny money up in Frankfurt …

Of course, Vlad will not just drop this one. Hegemony over the Ukraine is seen by the Russians as an essential strategic objective, and a cornerstone of Vlad’s Eurasion project. Also, a substantial proportion, at least, of the population of eastern Ukraine might be open to the suggestion that they should stage their own uprising in favour of the Russian option. Sounds a bit like the Kosovo situation writ large. Could develop into quite a mess … Best regards, JR.

I only saw the headline, but apparently there is an arrest warrant for the the president, Yanukovych, who fled to the east of the country…

If I were Yanukovych, I would find a way to Moscow asap. On known form in these situations, the best he can expect if captured is a long and uncomfortable stay in prison; the worst is, well, a lot worse. The timeline of this coup is interesting. One day, the bumbling European Union seems to have brokered a cessation of hostilities between the insurgents and the government involving the existing regime, albeit weakened, staying in place for the time being. Hardly 12 hours later, the police and Interior Ministry militia seem simply to have vanished from Kiev, along with (in spite of regime denials) most of the central civil service of the State. Power appears to fall into the hands of parliament (always in itself a pretty ineffective instrument to assume presidential powers in a state with a strong presidential system - or even otherwise) and an interim government, with uncertain authority, emerges, promising to form a “government of the people” with European Union orientation. How did this happen ?

Well, it is not really clear yet, but a not unreasonable speculation would be that elements of the Ukrainian Army - the ultimate basis of power (if not legal authority) in the State - made it clear behind the scenes that it had withdrawn its support from the government, and suggested politely to the police and militia that they do so too. The Yanukovych regime promptly, if quietly, collapsed, producing a situation in which the President went from Head of State to fugitive within a few hours, along with many of his officials and local oligarch supporters. The original insurgents seem confused and suddenly irrelevant. Behind the scenes, the generals grasp the reins of real power. There are many precedents for this sort of process, but the one that occurs most immediately to mind is Romania. No wonder Yanukovych is on the run.

This may be what happened - but it is certainly not the end of the story. For example - while (for all I know) the Ukrainian Army is dominated by ethnic Ukrainians, there is no guarantee that the whole army is in agreement with this course. One must assume that there is a substantial ethnic Russian element in the Army and, even if there is not a single ethnic Russian general, clever young lieutenants can become very significant in such circumstances. Bearing in mind that Vlad is likely already to have been fostering pro-Russian sentiment in eastern Ukraine and the Crimea, and that this is likely to have had some influence at least on elements in the Army, examples like Kosovo and, more generally, the breakup of former Yugoslavia, rear their heads. I really hope that somebody does have a grip (even an authoritarian one) on this situation, even if it is not apparent (yet). If not, the prospects could be bleak … Yours from Kharkov, on the back of a T-34, JR.

I agree and also suspect that Yanukovych’s rapid collapse had to do the the security forces themselves, then magnified with the question of the Army’s potential involvement in the crackdown. I think the security forces and the Army were increasing unwilling the enforce and Iranian style crackdown used to suppress the Green Revolution, and the tactic of using to snipers to shoot down civil rioters was already tenuous at best. I suspect he was vaguely threatened by “the generals” perhaps. There’s an article today that basically states that U.S. Vice President Joe Biden was instrumental in convincing him to flee to avoid bloodshed…

Things have gone suspiciously quiet. It is, however, not insignificant that the interim Ukrainian prime minister has expressed fears about threats to the integrity of Ukrainian territory - threats that would include secessionism in east Ukraine and the Crimea; a possible split in the army, with some elements supporting secession of these territories; and the intervention of Russia in support of the “threatened” rights of ethnic Russians. There is also the huge potential problem of the Russian Black Sea Fleet at Sebastopol in the ethnically Russian Crimea, a difficulty that, unless it is solved diplomatically, could result in Vlad’s legions intervening. And this is not to mention the Russian-Tatar issues within the Crimea … Mess, mess, mess … JR.

I heart Putty ordered a combat readiness survey of all Russian forces in the area this morning. I also heard a fairly belligerent Ukrainian general stating that the Ukraine would fight, and defeat, any Russian incursion…

Some of the language coming out of Moscow at the moment suggests that even Putin is getting a bit alarmed about the “momentum” of events. There would now appear to be a real possibility that some form of civil war may break out, in the Crimea in particular. If this were to happen, it would be near-impossible for Russia to avoid intervening in favour of the pro-Russian side - there is that Black Sea Fleet at Sebastopol, after all. The prospect of a “Sarajevo, 1914” situation developing in the Ukraine is not one for any of us to savour. Yours from the War Room, JR.

Friendly Russian gunmen guarding the main Crimean airports … … … Ukrainian generals promising resistance … … … Where is this going ? Prefer not to think. "We’ll met again, don’t know where, don’t when … ". Hope not . JR.

I dunno. I’ve read analysis that comes to the conclusion that it’s in no ones interest to go to war and that no one wants that. Probably a negotiated settlement guaranteeing autonomy in the Crimea and ties between Russia and a more independent Ukraine will probably be the end result, yours ever hopeful, Nick.

There are comparisons between today’s situation (3 March, 2014) and both the pre-war outbreak situations both in 1914 and 1939 - not to mention the Balkans. I find it hard to believe that a war could break out in “Eurasia” based on mechanics that Prince Bismarck would have recognised. Hold on to your oars, folks … Yours from the trenches at Brest-Litovsk, JR.

Fear not JR, we’ll all chip in to send you a parcel of hard tack, and Bovril to keep you going.(you’ll have to catch your own Rabbits though) :slight_smile:
I will say that with what I’m seeing in the news (for the penny all that is worth) I’m thinking that NATO is kinda wishing it still had some of those posts in Germany.