Under what sort of rule are people more liable to encounter civil rights abuses in the forms of repression of free speech, torture, illegitimate denial of the right to life (an actual term!), State supported violence, and domestic espionage.
It has been claimed that liberal democracies are as susceptible to these matters as any other form of government.
Your views please.
I think that is a terrible thing. People who took part in Human rights abusing must be punished.
A lot of countries suffered this class of abuses.
Argentina had them
Chile had them
United Kingdom had them
Central America had them
Africa had them
Middle East had them
of those nations in that list what are the defining characteristics of the perpetrating nations, for instance, Theocracy, Democracy, Electred Dicatorship, Military Junta?
Im trying to establish whether one particular form of leadership is more prone to abuse.
Surely there is a certain degree of truth in the saying that ‘Power Corrupts’. Put someone in a position where they could torture and abuse human rights, and only the very strong will resist the temptation if they are given the slightest means to justify it. Look at Gutanamo bay, and ponder on the civil rights restrictions that are creeping in here in the UK.
Also, very few of the so called ‘democratic’ systems are truely open and accountable, in the UK for example, it has been said that all we do is choose our dictator and his cronies (parliament) for the next five years, as we can’t boot them out half way through.
Although I think this latter point is a bit far-fetched, I think it does demonstrate that every system of government is open to abuse, and that the different systems are not as far removed from each other as you might be lead to believe by their various champions.
A
All authoritarian regimes have proved themselves prone to abuse.
Of course when the time is right,the people too feared and the voices so low, “Democracy” can claim some prizes…
oh!,defender of the human rights
and you defend the gurkhas then!,and don’t let me like the ss.
you kiss tatcher’s ***.
tatcher was a junta
http://www.maggiethatchersdead.co.uk/ :twisted:
The difference is that the Gurkhas dont have a drill for shoving people into ovens.
Gurkhas raped people
And your proof of that statment is ?
Are you equating the facilitation of the Death of 6,000,000 people with rape.
Please post a link that does not end with .ar to prove your assertion.
Then google Holocaust.
no,but raping is also an atroccity.
i know the holocaust killed much more people and was a bigger tragedy.
but a question,you prefer to die after being raped or in a gas chamber?
no,but raping is also an atroccity.
i know the holocaust killed much more people and was a bigger tragedy.
but a question,you prefer to die after being raped or in a gas chamber?[/quote]
Very ferrous answering post.
Refusal to answer the posted question followed by an irrelevant question frm yourself.
No doubt you will squeak about having yours answered first soon.
no,but raping is also an atroccity.
i know the holocaust killed much more people and was a bigger tragedy.
but a question,you prefer to die after being raped or in a gas chamber?[/quote]
Very ferrous answering post.
Refusal to answer the posted question followed by an irrelevant question frm yourself.
No doubt you will squeak about having yours answered first soon.[/quote]
are you going to answer it?
then shut up
Please post a link that supports your accusation that the Gurkhas are responsible for an atrocity
no,but raping is also an atroccity.
i know the holocaust killed much more people and was a bigger tragedy.
but a question,you prefer to die after being raped or in a gas chamber?[/quote]
Very ferrous answering post.
Refusal to answer the posted question followed by an irrelevant question frm yourself.
No doubt you will squeak about having yours answered first soon.[/quote]
are you going to answer it?
then shut up[/quote]
WOW !
You did exactly as I predicted, just a little earlier than I had expected.
But thank you for your intelligent and incisive input, I imagine this is the pinnacle of your debating skills.
http://libreopinion.com/members/elmalvinense/Relato.htm
if you don’t like or believe the site,it’s not my problem.
veterans like talking to that site’s staff.
i believe in veterans,and i don’t need your opinions if it is or not a credible site
http://libreopinion.com/members/elmalvinense/Relato.htm
if you don’t like or believe the site,it’s not my problem.
veterans like talking to that site’s staff.
i believe in veterans,and i don’t need your opinions if it is or not a credible site[/quote]My bold.
Ostriches and sand spring to mind…
Erwin please post a link in which the word Genocide is linked with the Gurkha’s
genocide don’t appears,but it’s an abuse of human rights,you don’t need to see that word,just recognize that
http://libreopinion.com/members/elmalvinense/Relato.htm
there says war crimes.
genocide don’t appears,but it’s an abuse of human rights,you don’t need to see that word,just recognize that
http://libreopinion.com/members/elmalvinense/Relato.htm
there says war crimes.[/quote]
Are you still unable to find a reliable and independent source ?
genocide don’t appears,but it’s an abuse of human rights,you don’t need to see that word,just recognize that
http://libreopinion.com/members/elmalvinense/Relato.htm
there says war crimes.[/quote]
Are you still unable to find a reliable and independent source ?[/quote]
that is reliable.
independent?,what do you mean of independent?