If you go back to the American grand strategic assessments in the 1930’s, you’ll find that the American reasoning was that it was in America’s interests not to have Nazi Germany as a major power for a whole host of power and trade reasons. It followed that American interests required opposing Germany, which meant supporting Britain.
America didn’t support Britain because they were mates, but purely because that was in America’s interests, which is how all nations work.
It was a fine run thing. Serious elements in corporate America were perfectly happy to trade with the Nazis and even supported them as bulwarks against communism. Some, like Henry Ford, also supported their anti-Semitic policies. There were also significant elements at all levels of American society, government and military who were anti-British. Not to mention Americans who, despite getting off fairly lightly in WWI compared with Britain and European nations, had no desire to get involved in another European war.
The Soviets got American help for the same reason that Britain got it. Because it was in America’s interests.
Same as Soviets got British help. Because it was in Britain’s interests.
Same as Stalin kept pressing America and Britain for an early second front. Because it was in USSR’s interests.
Nations don’t act out of altruism.
That’s left to the poor bloody grunts on the land, sea and in the air who believe the propaganda their nations feed them, to encourage them to fight and die for interests and profits they’ll never share in, and perform acts of great heroism just by fronting up for duty day after grinding day while the fat cats in their nation sip champagne and lick caviar out of high class whores’ navels, or elsewhere, while the rest of the nation struggles on under rationing.
How much weight did Stalin, or Churchill, lose during WWII?
Know what Hitler’s biggest health problem was, according to his doctor? Over-indulging in pastry, which caused his gastric problems. How many average Germans could over-indulge in pastry during WWII? They couldn’t get the fat to make pastry, for a start.
Who came out of the war bigger and better? Industrialists in all countries, or the poor bloody infantry in all countries?
And which industrialists and capitalists came out best, from the war and the interests it preserved? America’s.
And, oddly enough, probably Australia’s as the next, very small, cab off the rank. We ended up with Lend Lease credits and various profits from supplying the other Allies.
Meanwhile Britain buggered itself fighting the good fight and never went close to recovering its former glory.
America put more into Germany after WWII than it did to its British ally.
A simple example. A lot of Brits were still short of food when the Berlin air lift was on. They didn’t get the food, while the Germans did, because it was politically important for America to do it. It wasn’t politically important for America to feed the Brits who’d fought the war alone for a few years before America got seriously involved.
And after Hitlers cupturing the whole Europe - he joined with the Japanes in Middle Asia or Near East - the Next “target” would the the USA itself:)
No.
Geographically it’s not a launching point for an attack on the US.
It just gave Germany and Japan access to Middle East oil, which excluded the RN from it. USN didn’t need it.
Hitler had no intention of invading the US. Given he couldn’t even manage to attempt to invade England, he was no threat to the US.
Japan couldn’t invade the US.
Japan and Germany together couldn’t get a toehold in the US.
The end result would have been an accord, assuming America didn’t want to keep fighting. So far as Japan was concerned, there wasn’t going to be an accord.
And sure the European Fascist Union sould be the most powerful state in the world.
Sorry, I thought you were talking about the point we’ve come close to nowadays.
But I missed Fascist in European Fascist Union.