US Army Rifle Marksmanship Changing

One Shot, One Kill

March 27, 2008
Army News Service|by Mike A. Glasch

FORT JACKSON, S.C. - “One shot, one kill” may be the motto of the Army sniper, but for Soldiers qualifying in Basic Rifle Marksmanship, the traditional one shot per target on the range could soon come to an end.

The Basic Combat Training Soldiers of 2nd Battalion, 39th Infantry Brigade, are testing a new BRM qualification, which combines elements they will experience on the battlefield – movement, concealment, presence of civilians and using multiple rounds on an enemy.

“This is to give Soldiers a qualification standard that is more combat focused,” said Capt. Sammie Burkes, Company C commander. “It requires them to use those marksmanship skills they will encounter in a modern-day battlefield environment.”

L-shaped barriers have been placed in front of the berms on the firing ranges. At the start of the “Combat Shoot,” Soldiers are given four 10-round magazines. As they walk down the range on a simulated patrol, targets pop up and a loudspeaker blares the sound of shots being fired at them. Soldiers are required to engage multiple targets at different distances. The targets require one to three hits before they will go down.

“Lessons learned from Afghanistan and Iraq show that you may have to engage that target more than once before it goes down,” Burkes said. “This will teach the Soldiers that lesson, versus the regular BRM where with one hit, a target goes down.”

After the first round of targets, Soldiers rush to the barrier and change magazines, and repeat the scenario three times from behind the barrier – standing, kneeling and prone positions.

Company C drill sergeant Staff Sgt. Randall Weeks said this gives Soldiers more realistic training.

“They are actually moving, needing to find cover and reloading just like they will have to do in Iraq,” he said. “The old BRM didn’t teach them that. They are moving more. Having to run up to cover gets their heart beating. Once your heartbeat increases it actually moves your weapon and affects your aim. You have to learn how to manage it.”

During the last three scenarios a new twist is added. A target painted white appears representing a civilian. If a Soldier shoots the civilian, he or she is automatically disqualified.

“It’s teaching the Soldiers to have a little bit of target discrimination,” Burkes said.

“We’ve placed the civilian ‘target’ in the middle of the others,” said Weeks. “The Soldiers have to look beyond it and aim in front and behind.”

Another twist is dummy rounds loaded in the Soldier’s magazine. They can be in one, two three or all four of the magazines. The dummy rounds are designed to simulate a weapons jam, requiring Soldiers to perform SPORTS (slap, pull, observe, release, tap, shoot) to their weapon in the middle of their BRM qualification.

Burkes said he hopes the “Combat Shoot” will eventually replace the current BRM qualification.

“We would like to see this become the qualification standard versus the way we qualify now,” he said. “This is teaching Soldiers to have a little bit of target discrimination, to change magazines quickly, and that they may have to fire more than one round to put an enemy down. It keeps them more focused.”

Weeks agreed with his commander’s assessment. He said that training to the “Combat Shoot” standards makes his current group of Soldiers 100-percent better at BRM than previous cycles.

“We started teaching the techniques needed from day one of BRM. We had 100 percent of the company qualify (on the standard BRM) on the second day. In the past it would take all three days to get everybody qualified. That gives us a whole extra day of training,” he said. “When they are in Iraq, they’re not just going to be lying in a prone position or in a foxhole. They are actually going to have to learn how to get behind a car, or a wall and engage the enemy from around and over a cover.”

I think its is a step forward in training soldiers to fight in an engagement, rather than just be proficient shooters. Targets do not move much, and never fire back.

The problem with ANY fixed course of fire, or indeed cause of fire with slight variability is that ultimately it is possible to train to the course of fire. This always happens at the expense of general marksmanship.

In civilian shooting, there are many courses of fire which claim to be “practical”, but ultimately only test a very limited number of skills when applied in exactly the same way each time. Examples are 1500, Bianchi, NRA police pistol, NRA service pistol, and so on. The military courses of fire are also extremely prescriptive, even where they make use of electrically activated targets: you know exactly where they are going to come up, for instance.

The only disciplines which actually teach proper practical shooting are IPSC and IDPA. The target presentations are always different, and you will never see the same course of fire twice. If the stages are done unseen, they require a great degree of improvisational skill.

While this new proposed course of fire appears to be a step in the right direction, it still falls far short of what can be achieved by modifying IPSC style shooting to the needs of combat. The simple modifications are essentially forcing the use of cover, electrical reactive targets, and unseen stages.

The disadvantage of this for the military is that it cannot be prescriptively specified in a training manual and relies on the ability of training officers to set stages which give variety to the challenge.

Go to you tube and search for “IPSC rifle” and see what you find.

I agree this is a step in the right direction, but I don’t think it should replace their basic marksmanship training, it should only add to it.
Although firing at fixed targets on a known course does not do a good job of representing a combat situation, it is necessary to develop basic marksmanship fundamentals. In the Marines, a recruit has to qualify on a national match type course at 200, 300, and 500 yds in 4 shooting positions in order to be proficient at the basic marksmanship principles (sight alignment, breath control, etc.). It is only after learning basic marksmanship that the recruit will move on to combat type courses.
I think it is a mistake for the Army to have soldiers who have never fired a weapon to have any type of combat course as their “basic” rifle marksmanship.

A nice video showing how was the training in the old days:

http://www.archive.org/download/Rifl…fle_part_2.avi

56k Warning - that’s a 1.2GB file!

Locked my browser right up - even with broadband!

Thats too bad, its really a good video. Its definitely worth the trouble if you can find it. I found it about a year ago somewhere and I can’t seem to find it again. If I do find it I will post a link.

LOL I need to bittorrent that I think!

Save target as…and then go to the bed, te next morning you will see. :smiley: