Im pretty against this. However it is possible. I think we must have very harsh rules about it in order to keep them in line. If we do it we state the rules of the topics and no mercy if they are broken. Only way I see we can have it.
I agree general, I was only thinking that this debate brought us Eagle and a couple of other guys like Panzerknacker that then went onto provide good WW2 stuff.
But like you say, I’m not really sure about it either, Erwin seems to realise he is on his last chance here and it may be enought to tip him over the edge. He has been a good contributor in the past.
I just thought I would scetch out some rough guideliness for us to thrash out if we did bring it back.
It would make us look fair, but firm to the guys that want it and to the guys that dont want it, at least it will show that we have thought about it a bit.
Your call though in the end.
I don’t have now something to add to the topic, but in case I’d have, I could post it without problems here.
That’s why I am claiming the restablish of the topic, showing to all members that here, in this forum, the members have full-freedom to post.
Is it you Clauss mate?, your username is confussing me, and thank you for the advice.
no, thats the shortest and longest answer to have Falkland-Malvinas related topics again, case closed :idea:
Unless FW changes his mind the topic will remain closed.