I’m trying to remember where I saw the statistics, but it’s something like the US was the biggest producer of crude oil on earth at the time by quite a way. I don’t think any of the Arab countries had really developed any oil extraction capability at the time (Saudi Arabia might just have been starting - not sure). There were however certainly some oil fields in Persia (modern day Iran) - IIRC Jackie Fisher and Churchill colluded to secure them around the time of WW1 to allow the RN to build Oil-Fired ships.
In any case, there’s more to it than crude. The US also had a hell of a lot of refining capacity and expertise, something everyone else was rather shorter of.
Incidentally, if you’re advocating invading the middle east instead of Russia, dare I suggest you look at a map? The terrain is extremely hostile, the road and rail communications are practically nonexistent and you have an immense flank. A flank pointed straight at a rather hostile (if not yet belligerent) Russia. Should Russia join the war on the Allied side, it would be very easy for it to cut off and surround your entire front - Stalingrad on a massive scale. Not a good idea.[/quote]
Good points… so tell me… what did Mussolini (and I guess Hitler) want with the Middle East?? Where did Britian get most of her oil/fuel to fight her war? Did most come from US?
Okay… if the Germans had no interest in Middle east… take out Britian then… force her to surrender by building more U boats and starve her… or negotiate a peace. What else could they have done? Invade Canada? Yeah right!!!In FY1941 or 42… the germans produced somethign like 30 million tonnes of steel… only about 8.5 million of that went for military production… so it could of been done. I posted a link in a different topic about that…