[quote=“BDL”]
And you are not indigenous to the Falklands, so why do they affect you?[/quote]
you aren’t and the kelpers aren’t too
I’d say it is a valid point. The test of ownership you want to apply to the Falkland Islands produces ridiculous results when applied to almost any other country, including Argentina. Why is the result when applied to the Falklands not ridiculous?
And you are not indigenous to the Falklands, so why do they affect you?[/quote]
you aren’t and the kelpers aren’t too[/quote]
So nobody should live on the islands then, since they were unpopulated when they were discovered. You should be on the first plane back to Germany, except when you get there, you’ll have to prove that you can trace your family back to the Visigoths, so then you’ll have to work out where your German ancestors came from and go there, and so the process continues.
I’ve noticed that only comes out when you’ve been proved wrong about something and want to try and end the thread - or is that just a coincidence?
What does that smiley mean? That you concede the point and have nothing further to say on the matter?
The arrow is clearly in the wrong direction. Your avatar isn’t above the smiley, but to the left of it.
I’ve read both of Mr. Bramley’s books, and so far as I can tell from a rather bad babelfish translation of that passage it’s referring to part of the battle of Mount Longdon. Since when exactly has killing people during a battle in wartime been a war crime?
Oh, and unfortunately I don’t have my copy of his second book around to check if that passage is even in it - going by the veracity of the rest of your sources I have my doubts…[/quote]
if kicking soldiers,suking bayonets in their eyes,shoooting 2 shots in the heads to a wounded soldier (they did worst things,but this are the bramley words)
and they tried to penetrate the heads of the “argies” with the bayonet,instead of shooting a single shot or using the bayonet normally[/quote]
2 shots in the head of a wounded soldier! - Shocker its almost as if when wounded the argie cunt could have shot back and we wanted the invading scoundrel dead before he capped any of us. He was a soldier at war of course he got shot at its what he was paid for!
Bayonets in the eyes? - If you have read the book you will understand that you wonderful and superior grade arctic clothing made you pretty impervious in the thorax and abdomen to the best sheffield steel, therefore in a quest to find a soft spot to stick it in the yes seem to be a good option. The book is explicit in its references to the superior arctic kit worn by your boys if htey didnt want their peepers popped they should have taken off their parkas!
Kicking - well of course all british soldiers are mincing queers what else did you expect!
OK I have had enough I was saving this for later, but I’ll do it now. A few years ago I bought some Falklands war pictures off an Argentine man, he swore that the pictures were genuine, I believe him. They show the aftermath of a Gurhka rampage tourturing session. I have no doubt that this picture I am about to post has ever been doctured in anyway, and I take it to be the truth, and anyone who disagrees smells of urine.
Cast your peepers on this:
a mod insulting me! 
You twat, Mr Stella meet Mr Monitor
:lol:
I’m sure that’s the HMS Invincible I can see sinking in the background.
I fuck on your space elevator.
edited to add: Out off topic! Out off topic!!
The Argentine expansionism was nothing if we compare the British Empire expansionism in the two ages of Imperialism all over the world. You are the great politic-economic power thanks to all the recourses you had in all over the world, where the natives couldn’t defend themselves. Examples? China, Central America, Africa, India, Middle East.
A lot of the people you’re listed would certainly argue that they could (and did) defend themselves. The Pathans, Afghans, Sikhs, Zulu and Fuzzy-Wuzzy all gave the British one hell of a fight for a start. Even the Gurkhas became part of the British Army because they fought so well we decided that making peace with them and allowing them to join our army was easier than fighting them.[/quote]
You are only showing that you haven’t got any knowledge or any evidence to defend the british position. You are only saying “the islands are british because the flag is there”.
It’s the same if you say “this car is mine because I stoled it”
I repeat you as in my first post. If you have knowledges and respects, post here. If you don’t so don’t do it.[/quote]
It is exactly like that, though I prefer the example of squatters rights, I have lived on this land uncontested for 200 years and am the closest this territory has ever had to an indiginous population.
Look,its not going away jsut chill: Like this man. found on malvinarse.com.ar
http://www.skylighters.org/potd/images/sleepingtn.jpg
editted to paraphrase the earleir discussion
motherfucker!,post destroyed argentine aircraft!,but you don’t have to post dead soldiers!,and argentines!
you are shit bluffcove
Hes sleeping, hes as tired of this discussion as you are, I have never seen a dead soldeir so I wouldnt know what one looks like, hes jsut sleepy
Calm down 
yes mate,i can calm down,i resisted the pic of the argie aircraft destroyed as they resisted pics of destroyed ships.i also resisted the joke of buenos aires and the idiot post of king of nothing with draws.
BUT THIS
IS TOO MUCH :evil: .
you are a shit bluffcove,you have less heart than a potato
But that’s not the picture in his post. The one in his post is to two men sleeping on the pavement.