Reply to Gen Sandworm
Is a shame that this topic had as last picture that one posted by a pretty messed up member wich obviously have nothing to with the thread.
Let see if we can straigthen up a little.
A very good picture of San Julian AFB in may 1982.
454 kg bomb below an A-4b.
Get a grip mate.
Keep the advices to yourself you crazy homosexual troll.
Um, don’t you think you’re overreacting a bit here?
Maybe, but is the only way this people understand.
Maybe, maybe not (I’m not taking sides here). However, if you act like it again I’ll lock the thread. This forum is always under closer supervision due to the emotive nature of the conflict it discusses, and language like yours has no place in it. Understand?
For me you can lock it right now.
Who is the correct member to discuss the pictures with ? Cuts ? 1000 ydsscares, Lone Ranger ? Firefly ? psst, hardly any pleasure on that.
And sorry my language but that language is the one of a person who has been tired completely for the lack of respect of others towards my post.
Respect is not required in here. Politeness is. Learn the difference.
As the forum’s resident enforcer of politcally correct expression ;), might I suggest that it is highly inappropriate to give advice. Instead, suggestions should be offered for collaborative workshopping.
Similarly, ‘crazy’ is a judgmental term based in unanalyzed concepts of self and other which ignores the ultimate futility of attempting to define human thought and conduct in anything but deconstructionist terms. So, ‘cognitively different’ might better be substituted for ‘crazy’.
As for the poofter word (Which includes lady poofters, as my wife the teacher noted when one of her less gifted students described a fight with a gang of Lebanese, resulting in his breathless description of the action: ‘Then the Lesbos arrived.’. Alas, it’s true.), there’s nothing wrong with being mono-gender oriented.
Post-metric, one kilometre should be substituted for 1000 yards.
As staring is inappropriate, sexually harrassing, and borders on stalking, ‘stare’ should be replaced by ‘closely but sensitively observed’
So, applying these considerations, perhaps PK could have offered his comment in a more sensitive way designed to engage 1000yd long redux thingy in collaborative workshopping of the problem to produce strategies to construct a matrix which would enable them to go forward, going forward.
A suitable statement would have been “Keep your suggestions for collaborative workshopping to yourself you cognitively different, mono-gender oriented closely but sensitively observed kilometre long troll.”.
I trust that this has been a helpful contribution. 
I shall pass on the advice my mother use to give me.
“Once you resort to insults, you have lost the argument”.
I shall pass on the advice my mother use to give me.
“Once you resort to insults, you have lost the argument”.
That is a good advice but now I am a less well mannered person than used to be, I think that explains it a little. No more fancy argument, no more brainy conclutions, my aproach now is “if you agree fine, if not i dont care”, no neat but again, I am tired.
So, if you were still a mod, you’d be more tolerant?
.
.Why is it that Latin types have to flaunt their cojones, like the bloke far right?
PK, I have only just come back on thread, and if you go to the HMS Banford thread, you will see I have put forward a sensible post in response to your own.
Here, I merely commented on a silly comment you had made about my good self.
PS. I am not crazy nor homosexual nor a troll.
That’s not what I’ve heard.
Just kidding. So, where’ve you been?
Nice to see you chaps getting along as usual in my absence.
So, if you were still a mod, you’d be more tolerant?
No I wouldnt, there is no reason for that.
Back on topic please Chaps!
He never was tolerant even when he was a mod.
Forget about it?
Rising Sun*, with all due respect to your position as this forum’s rightful enforcer of politically correct expression, I believe you may have made a small miscalclation in your example for a better phrase that a demodded member might use should he wish to vent his pleen in a more pacific manner.
In my own opinion a more accurate wording would be:
“Please keep your suggestions for collaborative workshopping to yourself you cognitively different, mono-gender oriented, closely but sensitively observed 914.4 metre long troll.”.
I too trust that this has been taken in the correct spirit of contented co-operation.