Drug abuse is not allowed in the British military. (abuse meaning for non medical reasons) I am possibly the only student on my course not to engage in pot-smoking becasue as a reserve unit not liable for call up until the completion of my course and not likely to end up anywhere hot or sandy with live rounds in my gat for at least the next three years the British army doesnt want me near even the smell of weed - this to avoid future problems with drugs in my career! 4 years hence if I do get to Sandhurst!
Copies of “Soldier” and the rest of their ilk frequently carry warnings from the Medical types and disciplinary types warning about the use 'roids and growth hormone, I was taking pro-plus on a recent exercise and was reprimanded by a member of the DS because it can make you irritable, Drugs (by which I mean prescription controlled) are not as freely available as you may like ot think. Bearing in mind the size of the British military the size of the order for stimulants sounds surprisingly small, bearing in mind that that order is probably not going to be exhausted any time soon!
The french opposed the bombing of Lybia primarlily because being an ex colony a number of residnets held dual nationality with them, imagine a similair scenen being palyed out in Guam, or Midway.
The bombing (not shooting down) of the Lockerbie flight is not particularly akin to yesterdays events, one could choose instead to highlight the 7-12 year mainland bombing campaign of our Irish friends instead, and on the subject of brushing things under the carpet for the good of the Nation(NORAID - AIR AMERICA - COLUMBIAN DEATH SQUADS) I would say that yes we as Brits do keep our heads high through adversity. Something about being the only free nation in Europe for about four years during WWII and fighting on regardless, the fact that during the mainland bombing campaign we stood strong.
I am aware that We have America’s sympathy for yesterday’s attacks and I am grateful but to a small extent I am agrieved that it took the attacks of 9/11 to make America aware of the threat terrorists post to the world. nearly one bombing or shooting a month for close on seven years di alot to shape the British view of the World, and we are now very Glad to see America sharing that standpoint with us, without its previously isolationist stance and acting more reponsibly with the great influence it can exert over the globe.
With reference to “look out here come the RAF” I am not aware of the RAF being used to counter terrorists at any time in retaliation for a bombing within the UK. but this is essentially a differnece of doctrine, we tend to send the Hereford gun club and lympstone canoeists after nasty types.
With reference to “best trained military” The RM have the longest “basic” training of an infantry unit in the World, this is before their “to arms” training. Even the Paras in the British army gain their wings about a month before any green lids are handed to the Lympstone intake.
In fact once within RM, you can go on to become a combat swimmer within the SBS where dropouts from SBS selection can waltz directly to SAS selection. I am entering the realms of “hardest soldiers” and the issue was to do with training, but to denigrate the level of excellence found in lympstone is to not fully understand the RM mentality, incidentally I think the FFL are probably going to be the last men standing in any sort of “hard” contest. - (bit of an anal rant there)
Theoretically, if we are only the second best army in the world - we have looked to the wrong place to measure ourselves. With inferior numbers, inferior equipment, inferior soliders, we have at times and in places been chosen over and above the “best” in order that missions get completed successfully.
When Germany discovered it needed better provision for anti-terror work it turned to the British for the advice and training.
When Aden faced problems with communist backed Rebels (adoo) it was the British that went and “educated” the defence forces (reinforced)