No Kato - its obviously you nothing know about the conditions of the Soviet right’s collapse.
Tue - the Russian Ferderation succeeded al the foreign property of the USSR, wearpon bases, ambassies and ets - as the resault the RF was obligeded for the ALL the soviet international debts.
But NO ONE international law did not forced the RF to take the law obligations for the actions of Soviet gov.- therefore me who live all my lfe in Kuban have the EQUAL responsibility for the bolshevics crimes like and You who live in Kiev.
So you STRONGLY wrong about that the pretences to the USSR automatically goes to the Russian citizents- this is rough violation of the international law to blame the One state for the crimes of Another.( that would has the sequences).
As the resault - if this was possible the RF could get a thousands of court claims for the a billions compensations - but this do not heppends;)
Coz the RF is far not the USSR.
Some of people in different state actually try to spread the obligation of Germans after the war - to compensate the damage fo the relatives of victims- for ther Russia.
This is a stupid coz innthe cotrast with Germany where the Nazy come to the power ABSOLUTLY LEGALLY through the democratic elections - the bang of International bolshevicks in head of Trockij take the power through the bloody civil war ( the Ethnical genocide of RUSSIAN intelligencia( the Red Terror in 1918-1920) , and later the peasants ( the holodomor).
The responsibility for the actions of Soviet government as well as its debts still resides with the Russian Federation. The NSDAP didn’t win the elections in a legal way but Germany still pays for the past.
Having become Chancellor, Hitler foiled all attempts to gain a majority in parliament and on that basis persuaded President Hindenburg to dissolve the Reichstag again. Elections were scheduled for early March, but on February 27, 1933, the Reichstag building was set on fire.[27] Since a Dutch independent communist was found in the building, the fire was blamed on a Communist plot to which the government reacted with the Reichstag Fire Decree of February 28, which suspended basic rights, including habeas corpus.
This group of people - who even lived in Russian Imperia a tiny part of its life ( and some of then even did not SPEAK russian like the Radeck) who get the financial support for the USA , Britain and Germany ( for instance the Trockij has got the 20 million of dollars from the New York banker Jakob Shift in 1917- the enourmous sum at that time).
The terror that they bagan immediatelly after take the power was aimed FIRSTLY and MAINLY agains the Ethnical Russian- This is a historical fact.
And the Russian people was the ethnic group that suffer much more then the others in this prospect.
So me , being the Russian ( as and any other russian who has no relatives in the Soviet gov) could not be guilt for the crimes of the non-russiam mafia in that time.
Thus the RF etically and Juridically is not gult for the bolshevic crimes.
BTW as the Ukrainians are not guilt for the Nikita Khrushev too;)
The strongholds of Bolsheviks was the central regions of modern Russia, the original territory of Russian ethnicity. Bolsheviks’ terror was aimed against the adepts of the Tzar Russia that is the upper crust of the old society and some officers who resisted Bolsheviks ( it does not mean that these people were ethnical Russians as these people were very much cosmopolitic and often spoke foreign languages better than Russian ) They made up 1-2 per cent of Russian population and wanted to keep their previlages, status, property and money. One should remember that Don and Kuban cossacks claimed seperate ethnicity different from Russian one.
All the civil war was reduced to attempts of the upper crust of the old society and the officers of the Tzar army who formed so called white forces ( with huge military support on behalf Western states) to break through to the central original Russian regions (from Caucases, Baltik, Ukraine, Siberia) and crack down the mutiny. Bolsheviks would have failed to win unless 90% of ethnical Russians had eagerly supported them.
So the question of the courc claims for the compensatio from the RF is nothing but the political demagogy.( And in my previous post i just kidding about it - but it seems you did not understand it).
Indeed the any court claims immediatelly will arise the contr-investigation - who were the Bolshevics and who helped and sponsored them ?I.m sure the NO ONE from the finantial elite DO NOT WISH a such investigation. I hope you understan why.
Money does not shoot. The extent of foreign help to bolsheviks’ opponents ( White Forces) were tens of times more. And it was the most modern weapon and ammunition which was of more use in the war than the money which has yet to be exchanged for weapon.
I have the hard point agains the any nationalsis ( and Nationalist ideology at all) as the danger way for the any people- and the history enough good teachs us of it in example of UPA atrocoties above poles in 1943-44. You attempt to "justify " it like the Bolshevick too made it - is more then redicious.
If the bolshevics were the bastards who kille the people - does it mean the Nationalists who kille the people too - are better?
No . the nationalism ( like and nacism) is even more worst way of human history - and the WW2 history clearly proved it.
Unlike Ukrainian nationalism Russian Bolshevism and German Nazism was not aimed at the liberating these countries from foreign occuption. The comparison between Bolshevism and Ukrainian nationalism are laughable. All the people from illegal organizations fighting for the liberation against occupants can be called nationalists who kill people.
I repeat there are no poofs that UPA somehow violated the international law
and there are no official claims made about it. While the Polish colonists and Polish security forces who stole the land and were criminals even accorging the Polish laws.
You don’t want to understand that the state machines with other official ideologies different from the extreme ones can be much more oppressive and aggressive than groups of people with bellicose convictions.
